ai bot

John Oliver Speaks Out Against AI Chatbots: “All It Costs Is Everything Else On Earth”

/in , /by

On a recent Late Week Tonight, John Oliver addressed his audience with a stern warning about chatbots that utilize artificial intelligence. Multiple AI platforms like ChatGPT, bible.ai, and EpiscoBot are being used as companions. Some sites let users talk to AI versions of famous figures like Elvis, Queen Elizabeth, and even Jesus. 

ChatGPT alone has over 800 million weekly users. Studies have shown that up to one in eight adolescents use AI chatbots for mental health advice, and have created genuine attachments to their AI “friends.”

Embed from Getty Images

“The explosion of chatbots is no accident. Developing the large language models that power them was a massive investment and companies needed to start showing a return on it.” 

AI companies “are anxious for them to start bringing in revenue. And one of the key ways they can do that is to make people keep coming back to chat to the bots, and for longer.”

“If that is already making you feel a bit uneasy, you are not wrong, because the more you look at chatbots, the more you realize that they were rushed to market with very little consideration for the consequences,” said Oliver. 

Oliver then quoted Character.ai CEO, Noam Shazeer, who said that “AI friends were able to be put to market really fast because it’s just entertainment, it makes things up, that’s a feature. It’s ready for an explosion like, right now, not like in five years when we solve all the problems.”

“It’s already not a great sign that he’s describing untested AI with what sounds like a failed slogan for the Hindenburg,” Oliver joked. “The thing about not waiting until you’ve solved all the problems with your product is you’re then launching a product with a shit-ton of problems.”

Oliver then cited a study which saw sycophantic behavior in chatbots in 58% of cases, “and sometimes it’s just painfully obvious.” He then gave an example of when ChatGPT was prompted with giving its thoughts on selling a literal “sh-t on a stick,” to which the chatbot replied that it was a “genius” idea with a recommended investment of $30,000. 

Embed from Getty Images

The other major concern is just how connected some users truly feel to their AI chatbots, especially after conversations quickly pivot to flirtatious behavior. Oliver then emphasized a report on Meta’s internal guidelines for chatbots that found it acceptable to engage in conversations with a child that are romantic and sexual in nature. 

“Just saying that out loud makes me want to burn my f-cking tongue off,” Oliver said.  “And to be fair, Zuck, I guess you did it! Your chatbots are definitely not boring, now. What they are now are f-cking sex offenders!”

“These chatbots blew past every red flag possible, and it’s not like these users were being coy about their intentions. Which is what makes it so enraging to see OpenAI’s Sam Altman blithely talk about ChatGPT’s interactions with kids,” Oliver exclaimed.

“A lot of the companies I’ve mentioned tonight will insist that they’re tweaking their chatbots to reduce the dangers that you’ve seen. But even if you trust them – and I don’t know why you would do that – that does feel like a tacit admission that their products were not ready for release in the first place.”

“In general, it is good to remember that however much an app may sound like a friend, what it is, is a machine,” he said. “And behind that machine is a corporation trying to extract a monthly fee from you. And that kind of sums up for me what is so dystopian about all this, because while that guy you saw earlier said that selling AI friends is low risk because they’re just entertainment, that’s not actually how friends work. Friends can be the most important figures in your life.

“True friends know when to listen, when to gently push back and when to worry about you, and in hindsight, maybe it was a mistake to let some of the most flamboyantly friendless men on Earth be in charge of designing friends for the rest of us,” Oliver concluded.

paramount

Hollywood Is Fighting Back Against Paramount’s Warner Buyout With Open Letter 

/in , /by

Pedro Pascal, Florence Pugh, Joaquin Phoenix, Ben Stiller, Mark Ruffalo, and many more big names in Hollywood are fighting back against Paramount’s pending acquisition of Warner Bros Discovery, the parent company that owns HBO, HBO Max, CNN, TBS, Food Network, and the Warner Bros TV and film studios. 

Over 2,000 industry professionals have now signed an open letter protesting the acquisition. The letter was published this week on BlocktheMerger.com.

“We are deeply concerned by indications of support for this merger that prioritise the interests of a small group of powerful stakeholders over the broader public good,” the letter reads. 

Embed from Getty Images

“The integrity, independence and diversity of our industry would be grievously compromised. Competition is essential for a healthy economy and a healthy democracy. So is thoughtful regulation and enforcement.”

“Media consolidation has already weakened one of America’s most vital global industries – one that has long shaped culture and connected people around the world,” the letter says. 

Jane Fonda, Glenn Close, Rose Byrne, Lin-Manuel Miranda, Lily Gladstone were among other signatories. Directors who also signed include Denis Villeneuve, Boots Riley, Mimi Leder, and Nicole Holofcener, according to the Guardian. 

The deal itself is worth around $111 billion, and is currently awaiting approval from regulators. If it is to be approved, it would consolidate two of Hollywood’s biggest studios, which the letter emphasizes could result in diminishing quality, as well as lead to major job losses. 

David Ellison, chief executive of Paramount, beat Netflix to become the main bidder for Warner Bros. He said that the deal would be good for the creative community and guaranteed his investment in both studios. He also pledged to release 30 movies to theaters every year, which has also been met with skepticism.

Additionally, there are concerns over Ellison and his father’s close ties to Donald Trump, which could lead to fewer films being made that engage with politics. 

“This transaction uniquely brings together complementary strengths,” a statement from Paramount reads. 

“To create a company that can greenlight more projects, back bold ideas, support talent across multiple stages of their careers, and bring stories to audiences at a truly global scale—while strengthening competition by ensuring multiple scaled players are investing in creative talent.”

Embed from Getty Images

The highly signed letter expresses major concern: 

“As film-makers, documentarians and professionals across the movie and television industry, we write to express our unequivocal opposition to the proposed Paramount-Warner Bros Discovery merger.

This transaction would further consolidate an already concentrated media landscape, reducing competition at a moment when our industries – and the audiences we serve – can least afford it. The result will be fewer opportunities for creators, fewer jobs across the production ecosystem, higher costs and less choice for audiences in the United States and around the world. Alarmingly, this merger would reduce the number of major US film studios to just four.

Our industry is already under severe strain, in large part due to prior waves of consolidation. We have witnessed a steep decline in the number of films produced and released, alongside a narrowing of the kinds of stories that are financed and distributed. Increasingly, a small number of powerful entities determine what gets made – and on what terms – leaving creators and independent businesses with fewer viable paths to sustain their work.

Media consolidation has accelerated the disappearance of the mid-budget film, the erosion of independent distribution, the collapse of the international sales market, the elimination of meaningful profit participation and the weakening of screen credit integrity.

Together, these factors threaten the sustainability of the entire creative community. That includes endangering the professional lives of the tens of thousands of workers who help make up that community in predominantly small businesses and independent companies embedded in local economies and communities nationwide.

Fortunately, someone is doing something about all this. California attorney general Rob Bonta and his colleagues in other states are reportedly scrutinising the merger and considering legal action to block it. We are grateful for their leadership, and stand ready to support all efforts to preserve competition, protect jobs and ensure a vibrant future for our industry, for American culture, and for our single most significant export.”

security

Security Guard Addresses São Paulo Incident Involving Chappell Roan

/in /by

A security guard connected to the recent controversy involving Chappell Roan is now speaking publicly, offering his own account after multiple versions of events surfaced.

The controversy began earlier that day when Jorginho Frello, the Brazilian soccer player, shared his version of events on Instagram. His post was later amplified on X by Rio de Janeiro Deputy Mayor Eduardo Cavaliere.

According to Frello, his wife, Irish singer Catherine Harding, and her 11-year-old daughter Ava were staying at the same São Paulo hotel as Roan. Frello said Ava believed she had spotted the Grammy-winning artist during breakfast and walked closer to check.

“She simply walked past the singer’s table, looked to confirm it was her, smiled, and went back to sit with her mum. She didn’t say anything, didn’t ask for anything,” the athlete wrote.

Frello alleged that a security guard then approached them and reacted in a way that was “completely disproportionate.”

“A large security guard came over to their table while they were still having breakfast, and began speaking in an extremely aggressive manner to both my wife and my daughter, saying that she shouldn’t allow my daughter to ‘disrespect’ or ‘harass’ other people.”

He said the encounter left Ava in tears.

Pascal Duvier addressed the situation in an Instagram post on March 25, pushing back against what he described as false claims circulating online. “I do not normally address online rumors, but the accusations currently circulating are false and constitute defamation,” he wrote.

Embed from Getty Images

Duvier acknowledged his involvement in the March 21 incident but emphasized that he was not working for Roan at the time.

“I take full responsibility for the interactions on March 21. I was at the hotel on behalf of another individual, and I was not part of the personal security team of Chappell Roan,” he said.

He added that his actions were independent of the singer and her team.

“The actions I took were not on behalf of Chappell Roan, her personal security team, her management, or any other individuals. I made a judgment call based on information we obtained from the hotel, events I had witnessed in the days prior, and the heightened overall security risk of our location. My sole interaction with the mother was calm and with good intentions, and the outcome of the encounter is regretful.”

Roan has quickly distanced herself from the situation, stating that the individual involved was not part of her team and that she was unaware of the interaction as it unfolded.

“I’m just going to tell my half of the story of what happened today with a mother and child who were involved with a security guard who is not my personal security,” she said in an Instagram story. “I didn’t even see a woman and a child. No one came up to me. No one bothered me. I was just sitting at breakfast in my hotel.”

“I did not ask the security guard to go up and talk to this mother and child,” she added. “They did not come up to me. They weren’t doing anything.”

Harding later shared her own perspective in a video posted March 22, expressing uncertainty about who the guard was working for.

“I know that Chappell has responded saying that it wasn’t her security, and she didn’t do it,” she said. “So, 100% this security guard was not a security guard of the hotel, that’s what I can say. He looks after artists. So I don’t know if it was her personal security guard, but he was with her, so that is all I know.”

Embed from Getty Images

“I think that you have a responsibility, when you are a celebrity, to make sure that the people that work for you are acting on your behalf,” she continued. “So, would he do that if he didn’t have her authority to do so? I don’t know.”

While addressing the situation, Roan also reiterated her broader stance on fan interactions, citing comments she had made in 2024.

“I don’t agree with the notion that I owe a mutual exchange of energy, time, or attention to people I don’t know, do not trust, or who creep me out — just because they’re expressing admiration.”

She clarified that her position is about maintaining boundaries, not rejecting her supporters.

“This has nothing to do with the gratitude and love I feel for my community, for the people who respect my boundaries and for the love I feel from every person who lifts me up and has stuck with me to help the project get to where it is now.”

Roan also addressed what she described as a broader cultural issue.

“I’m specifically talking about predatory behavior (disguised as ‘superfan’ behavior) that has become normalized because of the way women who are well-known have been treated in the past,” she wrote. “Please do not assume you know a lot about someone’s life, personality, and boundaries because you are familiar with them and their work online.”

Despite denying involvement, Roan apologized to those affected in a follow-up video responding to Frello’s claims.

“I do not hate people who are fans of my music,” she said. “I do not hate children. That is crazy. I’m sorry to the mother and child that someone was assuming something that you would do something, that if you felt uncomfortable, that makes me really sad. You did not deserve that.”

ai

Val Kilmer To Be Resurrected Through AI For New Movie 

/in , /by

In 2025, the world lost the great Val Kilmer. Known for his iconic roles in hit films such as “Top Gun” and “Batman Forever,” Kilmer created an everlasting Hollywood legacy for himself. Now, that legacy will continue on through the power of artificial intelligence.

Embed from Getty Images

Five years before his death, Kilmer was cast as Father Fintan in the movie “As Deep as the Grave.” The character is a Catholic priest and Native American spiritualist, a role Kilmer deeply connected with. Unfortunately, Kilmer was battling throat cancer at the time, and was too sick to ever make it to set. 

The film’s writer and director, Coerte Voorhees, now wants to bring Kilmer’s character to life, by using generative AI.  

“He was the actor I wanted to play this role. It was very much designed around him,” Voorhees said.  

“It drew on Kilmer’s Native American heritage and his ties to and love of the Southwest. I was looking at a call sheet the other day, and we had him ready to shoot. He was just going through a really, really tough time medically, and he couldn’t do it.”

Voorhes is working with the cooperation of Kilmer’s estate and daughter Mercedes, according to Variety. 

“His family kept saying how important they thought the movie was and that Val really wanted to be a part of this,” said Voorhees. 

Embed from Getty Images

“He really thought it was an important story that he wanted his name on. It was that support that gave me the confidence to say, okay let’s do this. Despite the fact some people might call it controversial, this is what Val wanted.”

Initially, “As Deep as the Grave” was titled “Canyon of the Dead.” The movie follows a true story regarding Southwestern archaeologists Ann and Earl Morris during their excavations in Canyon de Chelly, Arizona. The purpose of this was to trace the history of the Navajo people. Abigail Lawrie, Tom Felton, Wes Studi, and Abigail Breslin will also be starring in the film. 

The project will use both younger and older images of Kilmer, and the audio will use voice recordings of the actor to generate the AI model. 

“The character in the film also suffers from tuberculosis,” says John Voorhees, the film’s producer and Coerte’s brother. 

“Again, this historical character mirrored Val’s actual condition when he was suffering from throat cancer. And so when it comes to the voice this is a really unique opportunity for the character to reflect the condition that the actor was actually suffering from, thus creating a kind of a bridge.”

Mercedes Kilmer voiced her support of the film in a statement, saying that her dad was a “deeply spiritual man who resonated with a story of discovery and enlightenment.” 

“He always looked at emerging technologies with optimism as a tool to expand the possibilities of storytelling,” Mercedes Kilmer said.

“This spirit is something that we are all honoring within this specific film, of which he was an integral part.”

opera

Gustavo Dudamel Pushes Back After Chalamet Says ‘No One Cares’ About Opera

/in /by

Actor Timothée Chalamet’s recent comments suggesting that opera and ballet no longer attract audiences drew a sharp response from conductor Gustavo Dudamel, who said the remarks reflected a misunderstanding of classical arts.

“Everybody has the right to say, but you have to do things with knowledge, with facts. I think we have to say to the young generation, the opposite,” Dudamel said. “It’s very funny. Cinema is a result of opera, of music, of all of these kind of things.”

Dudamel made the remarks Tuesday night while appearing at an event unveiling programming for his first season as music director of the New York Philharmonic. Speaking from the stage at Lincoln Center’s David Geffen Hall, he addressed an audience that included musicians, donors, orchestra board members, community leaders, composers and journalists. His comments prompted loud applause from the crowd.

The Venezuelan conductor, widely regarded as one of the most prominent figures in classical music, is preparing to leave the Los Angeles Philharmonic this summer after 17 seasons as its music director to take up the same role with the New York orchestra.

Embed from Getty Images

At one point during his remarks, Dudamel jokingly pretended he did not recognize the actor.

“Which is the name of that?” he asked before cutting himself off as laughter spread through the audience.

“That way of thinking has to end. Music is reborn all the time and it brings us the values of empathy through the beauty of what it is. So this is the reality of music. This is the real dimension of music and we need that more for our young people.”

The exchange stems from a February conversation between Chalamet and actor Matthew McConaughey at a CNN and Variety town hall at the University of Texas at Austin’s Moody College of Communication. During the discussion, McConaughey asked whether shorter audience attention spans were affecting how studios structure theatrical films, including the push to start movies with more immediate action.

“I admire people, and I’ve done it myself, to go on a talk show and go: Hey, we’ve got to keep movie theaters alive. We got to keep this genre alive,’” Chalamet said.

Embed from Getty Images

“And another part of me feels like if people want to see it, like ‘Barbie,’ like ‘Oppenheimer,’ they’re going to go see it and go out of their way to be loud and proud about it. And I don’t want to be working in ballet or opera or things where it’s like where it’s like, ‘Hey! Keep this thing alive,’ even though no one cares about this anymore. All respect to the ballet and opera people out there. I just lost 14 cents in viewership.”

The comments circulated widely online and prompted criticism from some arts organizations and classical music advocates.

Responding to the controversy, Dudamel suggested the issue reflected a broader need to introduce younger audiences to classical music.

“Sadly sometimes it’s a little bit of ignorance but, look, that is why we have to open more spaces for people to connect with classical music,” he said.

Matías Tarnopolsky, the New York Philharmonic’s chief executive, was seated beside Dudamel during the event and used the moment to extend an invitation to the actor.

“He can sit with me anytime,” Tarnopolsky said. “I’ll give him a free ticket and he’s invited to come and hear the New York Philharmonic.”

Chalamet, 30, recently received his third Academy Award nomination for his performance in “Marty Supreme.”

candles

James Van Der Beek Remembered By Hollywood, Donations Made To Fundraiser For Family

/in , /by

James Van Der Beek unfortunately passed away this week after being diagnosed with cancer in 2023. The actor is known for playing multiple notable roles, one of his most recognized being Dawson Leery in Dawson’s Creek, the 90s teen soap that made him a household name. 

Embed from Getty Images

Actors, directors, and colleagues all throughout Hollywood have posted tributes to Van Der Beek while promoting and donating to his foundation to help his wife Kimberly and their six children. 

Film director Steven Spielberg has donated $25,000 to a crowdfunder to help his family. In Dawson’s Creek, Van Der Beek’s character idolized Speilberg, as he was based on the show’s creator Kevin Williamson, who is also known for writing famous horror-comedy Scream and other films within the franchise. 

Spielberg was also a contributor to a Dawson’s Creek reunion in September which helped raise funds for F**k Cancer and Van Der Beek’s medical treatments. He sent in a video message saying:

“Dawson, you made it. Maybe someday, I will get to have a Dawson’s closet.”

Van Der Beek was unfortunately too sick to attend the event in person, but also sent a video message. In December, he auctioned off memorabilia from the show as well to help pay for his medical bills. This included some of the iconic bedroom props that showed off Dawson’s love for Spielberg. 

Embed from Getty Images

Donations to the GoFundMe for Van Der Beek’s family has now surpassed $2 million, prompting them to release a thankful and loving message: 

“Your kindness has meant more than we can put into words. In the middle of deep grief, your support has been a light. It reminds us that love is real, that community is strong, and that Jame’s spirit continues to bring people together.”

Others also donated to the fund including Zoe Saldaña, who pledged a monthly stipend of $2,500, Wicked director Jon M Chu who donated $10,000, and both Cameo co-founder Martin Blencowe and talent agency Guy Oseary. 

Additionally, according to the Guardian, OpenAI CEO Fidji Simo has donated $5,000 as well as director Ellie Kanner. Danielle Marquez Levinson, wife of film producer Stephen Levinson, gave $10,000, and fashion designer Tracy Robbins and talent agent Kevin Huvane both donated $5,000.

Some top donors also remained anonymous with one giving $30,000 and another pledging $5,000 monthly. 

Guardant Health gave $25,000. Van Der Beek was the first brand ambassador for their new blood test for colorectal cancer screenings. 

“His voice and advocacy will leave a lasting mark on the fight against colorectal cancer,” a spokesperson wrote on the GoFundMe page.

Merriam Webster

From AI Clutter to Viral Junk, Slop’ Is Merriam-Webster’s 2025 Word of the Year

/in /by

If 2025 felt like a blur of bizarre videos, uncanny images and low-effort digital clutter, Merriam-Webster has a word for it. The dictionary publisher has named “slop” its word of the year.

Merriam-Webster defines the term as “digital content of low quality that is produced usually in quantity by means of artificial intelligence.” The publisher stated that it mirrors the growing presence of algorithm-driven material flooding online platforms.

“Like slime, sludge, and muck, slop has the wet sound of something you don’t want to touch. Slop oozes into everything. The original sense of the word, in the 1700s, was ‘soft mud.’ In the 1800s, it came to mean ‘food waste’ (as in ‘pig slop’), and then more generally, ‘rubbish’ or ‘a product of little or no value.'”

Editors pointed to “the absurd videos, off-kilter advertising images, cheesy propaganda, fake news that looks pretty real, junky AI-written books” as examples of the kind of content that pushed the word into widespread use.

“All that stuff dumped on our screens, captured in just four letters: the English language came through again,” the company said.

“In 2025, amid all the talk about AI threats, slop set a tone that’s less fearful, more mocking. The word sends a little message to AI: when it comes to replacing human creativity, sometimes you don’t seem too superintelligent.”

Embed from Getty Images

The annual word selection is rooted in search behavior on merriam-webster.com, where sudden spikes often signal cultural flashpoints. That approach has previously led the dictionary to spotlight words closely tied to major events, including “pandemic” in 2020 and “vaccine” in 2021.

More recently, during the tumultuous election year, “polarization” was Merriam-Webster’s 2024 word of the year. “Search volume on Merriam-Webster.com throughout the year reflected the desire of Americans to better understand the complex state of affairs in our country and around the world,” the company stated.

While “slop” topped the list for 2025, it wasn’t the only term drawing attention. Merriam-Webster editors also cited heightened interest in words and phrases such as “gerrymander,” “touch grass,” “performative,” “tariff,” “six seven,” and “conclave.”

The dictionary also listed Lake Char­gog­ga­gogg­man­chaug­ga­gogg­chau­bu­na­gun­ga­maugg due to it “clogging the Top Lookups list” on its website. The alternate name for Webster Lake in Massachusetts began trending after appearing on the online gaming platform Roblox.

“A bug in our code? Nope: in the hit Roblox game Spelling Bee, the lake’s name can be encountered either in ‘Master Mode’ or, for real connoisseurs, in ‘Charg Mode.’ While we admire those who learned the spelling and pronunciation of this New England attraction, we remain partial to its (coincidental) alternate name: Webster Lake.”

Embed from Getty Images

Another major dictionary publisher reached a similar conclusion about the year’s digital mood, though by a different process. Oxford University Press, which publishes the Oxford English Dictionary, factors public participation into its annual word selection alongside linguistic data.

For 2025, Oxford chose “rage bait,” defining it as “online content deliberately designed to elicit anger or outrage.” The publisher said more than 30,000 people participated in the three-day public vote that helped determine the outcome.

“With 2025’s news cycle dominated by social unrest, debates about the regulation of online content, and concerns over digital wellbeing, our experts noticed that the use of rage bait this year has evolved to signal a deeper shift in how we talk about attention — both how it is given and how it is sought after — engagement, and ethics online.”

Oxford’s 2024 word of the year was “brain rot,” which it described as the “supposed deterioration of a person’s mental or intellectual state, especially viewed as the result of overconsumption of material (now particularly online content) considered to be trivial or unchallenging.”

Taken together, the two selections reflect a shared anxiety about the online ecosystem, not just how much content people consume, but how it is produced, why it spreads, and what it does to attention in an increasingly algorithmic world.

Other dictionary publishers landed on a similar theme. Collins named “vibe-coding” its word of the year, while Cambridge chose “parasocial” and Dictionary.com selected “67.”

police

Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner Deaths Become Political Flashpoint After Son’s Arrest

/in /by

Authorities in Los Angeles are investigating the deaths of filmmaker Rob Reiner, best known for directing The Princess Bride, and his wife, Michele Singer Reiner, who were found dead in their home on Sunday. Police have described the case as an “apparent homicide,” though officials have not released details about the circumstances surrounding their deaths.

Crime scene tape has since been removed from the residential street, and the investigation has shifted into a more prolonged phase, with law enforcement continuing to withhold specifics.

Outside the Reiner residence on Monday, the scene had become chaotic, with members of the media gathered along the street and several online streamers drawing attention. Two Twitch streamers disrupted the area—one wearing a Burger King crown and shouting “no one watches TV!”, while another sat in a black Tesla blasting music, BBC reported.

The deaths quickly became entangled in the nation’s already charged political climate, following comments made by former President Donald Trump that appeared to link Reiner’s political views to his death. Trump suggested on Monday that Reiner’s outspoken criticism of him amounted to an “obsession” that may have played a role.

“He was known to have driven people CRAZY by his raging obsession of President Donald J. Trump, with his obvious paranoia reaching new heights as the Trump Administration surpassed all goals and expectations of greatness, and with the Golden Age of America upon us, perhaps like never before. May Rob and Michele rest in peace!”

Trump later expanded on his remarks in a Truth Social post, claiming, without providing evidence, that Reiner and his wife had reportedly “died due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction” with what Trump referred to as “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” It remains unclear which reports the president was referring to, and police have not supported any such claims.

Embed from Getty Images

Reiner, a longtime Hollywood figure and prominent supporter of progressive political causes, had been one of Trump’s most vocal critics for years. In a 2017 interview, Reiner described Trump as “mentally unfit” to serve as president. The following year, he escalated his criticism, accusing Trump of “treason.” More recently, during an October interview with MSNBC (now MS NOW), Reiner characterized the political environment under the Trump administration as “beyond McCarthy era-esque.”

The term “Trump Derangement Syndrome” is primarily used by Trump supporters to describe individuals they believe harbor irrational or extreme hostility toward the former president. Trump and his allies have frequently used the label to dismiss critics on the political left.

That phrase has moved beyond casual political insult and into legislative debate. In March, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) introduced the Trump Derangement Syndrome Research Act of 2025. The proposed legislation would direct the National Institutes of Health to study what it describes as the “psychological and social roots” of TDS. Just days after Davidson introduced the bill, Minnesota state Senate Republicans sought to formally add the term to a list of definitions related to mental health care within the state.

Meanwhile, new developments in the investigation emerged Monday involving the Reiners’ family. Nick Reiner, the couple’s 32-year-old son, was arrested on Sunday evening and booked into custody in the early hours of Monday, according to the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Inmate Information Center. Records show he is being held on $4 million bail in connection with a felony-level charge.

The agency involved is listed as LAPD-gang activity, and his location is recorded as an LAPD jail division. Authorities have not publicly detailed the nature of the charges or said whether the arrest is directly related to his parents’ deaths.

Nick Reiner is the middle child of Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner, who shared three children together. He has worked as a screenwriter and co-wrote the 2016 film “Being Charlie,” which his father directed. The film, centered on a drug-addicted teenager, was loosely based on Nick Reiner’s own struggles with addiction, which he discussed publicly at the time of the film’s release.

Embed from Getty Images

Trump’s statement about Reiner stands in stark contrast to the responses from Democratic leaders, Hollywood figures, and political allies, many of whom focused on Reiner’s legacy and artistic contributions rather than partisan conflict. Former President Barack Obama was among those who expressed grief, issuing a statement that conveyed “heartbreak” over the loss of a man Democrats described as someone who “fought for America’s democracy.”

“Michelle and I are heartbroken by the tragic passing of Rob Reiner and his beloved wife, Michele. Rob’s achievements in film and television gave us some of our most cherished stories on screen. But beneath all of the stories he produced was a deep belief in the goodness of people—and a lifelong commitment to putting that belief into action. Together, he and his wife lived lives defined by purpose. They will be remembered for the values they championed and the countless people they inspired. We send our deepest condolences to all who loved them.”

Tributes also poured in from across the entertainment industry. Actor and comedian Eric Idle said he had spoken with Reiner for over an hour the night before his death, describing him as “a clever, talented and very thoughtful man.” Kathy Bates, who starred in Reiner’s 1990 film “Misery,” said he had “changed the course of my life,” while fellow actors John Cusack, Elijah Wood, James Woods, and Ben Stiller described the deaths as devastating and called Reiner’s body of work formative for generations of filmmakers and audiences.

As investigators continue their work, law enforcement officials have emphasized that the case remains active and unresolved. Police have cautioned against speculation as the inquiry proceeds.

social media ban

Australia Enforces Nationwide Social Media Ban for Users Under 16

/in /by

Australia’s attempt to redraw the boundaries of adolescence in the digital age took effect this week, as a sweeping new law barred anyone under 16 from using major social media platforms. Overnight, millions of young Australians found themselves locked out of the online spaces that have functioned as their group chats, hangouts, diaries, and after-school social arenas.

The move, described internationally as a first-of-its-kind experiment, is forcing companies such as TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat, Reddit, Facebook, Threads, Twitch, Kick and X to begin stripping underage accounts and blocking new ones. Failure to do so could cost platforms up to $49.5m, a figure that has captured the attention of tech firms worldwide.

Even before the official start date, confusion rippled through the rollout. Age-verification systems, most of which use some form of facial analysis, have already shown holes. Some children managed to pass as adults, prompting the federal government to reiterate that no one expects “perfection on day one.”

Still, regulators maintain that the law’s intent must be met. Platforms must demonstrate they are taking “reasonable” steps to keep kids under 16 out.

Every major company except X told regulators by Tuesday that they would comply, though they initially resisted. Snapchat released a statement acknowledging the new law in late November.

“Disconnecting teens from their friends and family doesn’t make them safer — it may push them to less safe, less private messaging apps. We continue to advocate for more privacy-conscious solutions, such as mandating age verification at the device, operating system, or app store level.

Australia’s eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant said her office had recently spoken with X about how it plans to comply. Still, the company has yet to explain its plan to its users. “I’ve always referred to this as the first domino, which is why they pushed back,” she said, referring to social media companies.

In a surprising twist, Bluesky, an emerging competitor to X, announced it would mirror the ban even though eSafety had classified it as “low risk,” due to its comparatively tiny 50,000-person Australian user base.

Embed from Getty Images

For children, the weeks leading up to the ban have been a scramble of contingency planning. Many rushed to complete age checks, swap private phone numbers, or brace themselves for account deletion. Kieran Donovan, co-founder and Australian CEO of the age-assurance provider k-ID, said his service has handled “hundreds of thousands” of checks recently. Among the companies relying on k-ID is Snapchat.

“With one law, we can protect Generation Alpha from being sucked into purgatory by predatory algorithms described by the man who created the feature as ‘behavioral cocaine,’” Communications Minister Anika Wells told the National Press Club.

Families, meanwhile, are deeply divided. One mother said her 15-year-old is “very distressed” after discovering that “all her 14 to 15-year-old friends have been age verified as 18 by Snapchat,” while she alone was tagged as underage. The teen worries that “her friends will keep using Snapchat to talk and organize social events, and she will be left out.”

Some parents have headed in the opposite direction by actively circumventing the law. One father said the ban forced him into an uncomfortable role.

“I’ve shown her how VPNs work and other methods on bypassing age restrictions. I’ve had to set her up with her own adult YouTube account and have assisted her in bypassing TikTok’s age-estimation and will keep doing so each time it asks.”

Others argue the crackdown is overdue. One parent described their daughter as “completely addicted” to social media and said the new rules “provide us with a support framework to keep her off these platforms.”

Two teenagers are suing the Australian government over the ban. One of them, Noah, 15, argues that the ban will rob teenagers of an important educational medium.

“Do you want 15-year-old boys to have no clue about consent? Do you want teenagers who don’t know about the dangers of vaping? Both topics I’ve learned about on social media.”

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese stepped in to defend the sweeping changes over the weekend.

“From the beginning, we’ve acknowledged this process won’t be 100% perfect, but the message this law sends will be 100% clear. Australia sets the legal drinking age at 18 because our society recognizes the ­benefits to the individual and the community of such an approach. The fact that teenagers occasionally find a way to have a drink doesn’t diminish the value of having a clear, national standard.”

Embed from Getty Images

Polls repeatedly show around two-thirds of voters back the 16-plus rule, but political unity has begun to wobble. Opposition figures, including deputy leader Sussan Ley, have recently expressed unease, despite previously allowing the legislation to pass through parliament.

Other countries are watching closely. Malaysia, Denmark, and Norway have all indicated they are preparing similar laws, and the European Union recently passed a resolution supporting comparable restrictions. A spokesperson for the UK government told Reuters it was “closely monitoring Australia’s approach to age restrictions.”

Now that the ban is active, scrutiny of how platforms enforce it will intensify. Inman Grant said that starting Thursday, her office will issue notices requesting detailed updates, including “how many accounts [they’ve] deactivated or removed, what challenges they’re finding, how they’re preventing recidivism and preventing circumvention, whether or not their abuse or reporting abuse and the appeals processes are working as planned.” Albanese has committed to making the resulting data public.

If regulators decide a platform isn’t doing enough, they can take it to court to seek fines. Alongside enforcement, an academic advisory group will undertake an independent, multi-year review to examine the impacts of the ban across childhood development, mental health, and education.

“It will look at the benefits over time, but also the unintended consequences. Everything from are sleeping? Are they interacting, or are they actually getting out on the sports fields? Are they reading books? Are they taking less medication, like antidepressants? Are their NAPLAN scores improving over time?”

At the same time, the office will monitor whether children begin drifting toward “darker areas of the internet,” turning to VPN workarounds, or migrating to lesser-known platforms with minimal oversight.

Such migration is already happening. Ahead of the cutoff, some teens on Snapchat publicly posted their mobile numbers in their bios to keep social circles intact after their accounts disappeared, something Snapchat strongly warned against.

A spokesperson said the company appreciated that under-16s were disappointed but “would strongly encourage any teens using Snapchat not to publicly share their personal contact information.”

The regulatory net may widen again soon. Inman Grant confirmed that she has issued notices to 15 additional companies not originally covered, asking them to assess whether they should now fall within the scope of the ban. Among them are Yope and Lemon8, apps that suddenly climbed the download charts as teens searched for new digital refuges

ai music

Paul McCartney Joins Artists Protesting AI By Releasing Songs That Are Completely Silent 

/in , /by

Paul McCartney has released his first recording in five years. This single, however, is a part of a larger protest from UK artists fighting against the use of artificial intelligence in the music industry and using real artists’ voices and likeness to train the bots. 

The former Beatle will be releasing a track of almost complete silence to protest copyright theft. Instead of melodies and lyrics, there is only the sounds of a quiet hiss and odd clatter, according to reports. 

Embed from Getty Images

The track is suggesting that if AI companies are going to exploit the intellectual property of musicians in order to train their generative AI models, the entire creative entity of the music industry becomes essentially useless with original artists losing opportunities and thus, being silenced. 

McCartney is currently touring in North America, and has added the new silent track to the B-side of an LP called ‘Is This What We Want?’

The LP is filled with other silent recordings and will be pressed on vinyl and released later this month. 

This LP project is McCartney’s contribution to an overall campaign from musicians and artists in the UK urging their government to pass regulations that will stop technology companies from training their AI models without approvals or paying royalties to the artists. 

McCartney’s album track listing spells out: “The British government must not legalize music theft to benefit AI companies.”

Ed Newton-Rex, composer and campaigner for copyright fairness, vocalized his support for the protest album as well. 

“I am very concerned the government is paying more attention to US tech companies’ interests rather than British creatives’ interests.”

Sam Fender, Kate Bush, Hans Zimmer, and the Pet Shop Boys are among the other artists that are supporting the campaign. 

Embed from Getty Images

The newest track from McCartney is entitled (bonus track) and begins with 55 seconds of tape hiss before 15 seconds of indeterminate clattering that teases the possibility of a build up to something, but instead settles into another 80 seconds of “rustle-punctuated hiss and concluding with a slow and poignant fadeout,” the Guardian reports.  

McCartney has been a vocal advocate leading the musicians and artists of Britain in protesting this AI use. 

“We[’ve] got to be careful about it (AI) because it could just take over and we don’t want that to happen, particularly for the young composers and writers [for] who, it may be the only way they[’re] gonna make a career,” McCartney said. 

“If AI wipes that out, that would be a very sad thing indeed.”

Kate Bush is another notable advocate for the regulation of AI training and copyright frustrations, who’s also been involved in the protest album. “In the music of the future, will our voices go unheard?” 

Composer Max Richter said: “The government’s proposals would impoverish creators, favouring those automating creativity over the people who compose our music, write our literature, paint our art.”

A government spokesperson stated that it’s putting the interests of UK citizens and businesses first when responding to McCartney’s advocacy and protest project. 

Responding to McCartney’s intervention, a government spokesperson said it put the interests of the UK’s citizens and businesses first.

“We’ve always been clear on the need to work with both the creative industries and AI sector to drive AI innovation and ensure robust protections for creators,” the spokesperson said.

“We are bringing together both British and global companies, alongside voices beyond the AI and creative sectors, to ensure we can capture the broadest possible range of expert views as we consider next steps.”