Posts

nyc

NYC Is One Of The Best Cities In The World, According To New Report

/in , /by

Every year, the Resonance Consultancy ranks the best cities in the world by analyzing over 270 cities and publishing a comprehensive list for the public to learn about some of the most famous cities in the world. 

Embed from Getty Images

The full report utilizes user-generated reviews, social media, online activity/popularity, and other statistics to create their rankings. 

According to Time Out Magazine and the report itself,  other “analyzed metrics include a wide range of factors that have historically shown positive correlations with attracting employment, investment and/or visitors to cities.”

The ninth annual report listed London as the best city in the world, followed by Paris and then New York. Tokyo and Singapore marked the fourth and fifth spots on the list. The US is also the only country with two cities in the top 10, with San Francisco being listed as number 7.

Written as “the greatest city in America” in an accompanying essay to the report, the study mentions “New York’s dizzying roster of new shows, hotels and parks” as part and parcel of its perennial appeal, despite the record real estate prices that have defined life in the city in recent years.”

According to Time Out Magazine, “In a nod to 2023 and 2024 in specific, the survey also mentions two key events that render New York the ideal destination at this precise moment in time: the celebrations surrounding the 50th anniversary of the birth of hip hop music, which was founded in the Bronx on August 11, 1973, and the 100-year anniversary of the Museum of the City of New York.”

Embed from Getty Images

The top 10 best cities in the world for 2024 are as follows: 

  1. London, UK
  2. Paris, France
  3. New York City, US
  4. Tokyo, Japan
  5. Sinagpore
  6. Dubai, United Arab Emirates
  7. San Francisco, US
  8. Barcelona, Spain
  9. Amsterdam, Netherlands
  10. Seoul, South Korea
Rising Sea Level

Rising Sea Levels Pose Greater Threat to Cities Than Previously Thought

/in , /by

Scientists have known for some time that global warming will lead to the melting of the ice caps, and in turn the rising of sea levels, threatening coastal cities. But scientists have disagreed over the timing and the extent of the impact of rising sea levels. New research, however, suggests that three times more people than previously thought could be affected by rising sea levels by 2050. The research was conducted by Climate Central, which is based in New Jersey, and was published in Nature Communications.

The new research, which uses advanced techniques based on satellite readings of land elevation, shows that previous predictions about the scope of rising sea levels were too optimistic. According to the new research, 150 million people currently live in areas that by 2050 will be below the high-tide line. Southern Vietnam, for instance, is at risk of disappearing almost entirely. Ho Chi Minh City, the nation’s economic center, could collapse.

Embed from Getty Images

Another country predicted to be strongly impacted by rising sea levels is Thailand, where the city of Bangkok is expected to be all but underwater in 2050. More than 10 percent of Thai residents live on land that will experience inundation in 2050, as do a quarter of Vietnamese residents, totaling more than 20 million people in those two countries alone.

Rising sea levels are expected to affect even those people who do not live in areas prone to flooding, as inundation of economic centers will have a drastic impact on the places that people work and live. Many of the world’s cities developed on coasts, putting them at particular risk for the effects of rising sea levels. Shanghai, for instance, is under direct threat of being consumed by water, as is much of the surrounding area. Mumbai, India’s financial capital and one of the world’s largest cities, is at high risk, as is the ancient city of Alexandria.

Also at risk are places where few people live, but have great historical significance, as they contain artifacts created by humans who lived centuries ago.

While the reality of rising sea levels is all but confirmed, there are measures that cities can take to combat the effects of climate change. Already, 110 million people live in places below the high tide line, as seawalls and other barriers prevent flooding. In order to combat this particular threat of climate change, many of the world’s cities previously unaffected by flooding will have to invest in technologies like seawalls in order to survive the end of the 21st century. As these massive infrastructure projects can be costly and take a long time to complete, particularly vulnerable cities would be wise to make such investments as soon as possible.

Embed from Getty Images

That being said, protective measures can only go so far and are prone to human error, as infamously occurred in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina. Also at risk are places where few people live, but have great historical significance, as they contain artifacts created by humans who lived centuries ago. Unfortunately, these places are the least likely to be shielded by the effects of rising sea levels over the rest of this century, as the cost of doing so is great and offers little economic return.

Rising sea levels, of course, are not the only effects of climate change. Another major environmental consideration for cities as time progresses is the increasing frequency of extreme weather events, which pose a threat to both infrastructure and human life. Already, these effects are felt in the form of unprecedented, raging wildfires in California, which many experts believe to be exacerbated by the effects of climate change. Additionally, climate change has increased the intensity of hurricanes and other storms, as in the case of Hurricane Dorian, which devastated the Bahamas. While the reality of anthropogenic climate change is not in dispute among reputable scientists, ongoing research continues to reveal the various ways in which climate change affects and will continue to affect human life, oftentimes revealing that the impact will be more severe than previously thought.

Train travel

Should You Consider Traveling By Train Instead of By Plane?

/in , /by

If there’s one aspect of traveling that can really put a damper on the experience, it’s the stress and frustration of dealing with airports. They are often crowded, the food is usually overpriced and mediocre, and going through security is a pain. Air travel generally involves spending long hours sitting in airports, where access to electrical outlets is limited, cellular data networks are congested and sometimes fail, and free Wi-Fi is nowhere to be found. And the experience is not much better once you get in the air; seat sizes have been steadily decreasing over the years to fit more people onto planes, in-flight entertainment options are usually limited, and meals are generally limited to bags of chips and small cups of soda. Nevertheless, plane trips are widely regarded as a necessary evil when traveling to sufficiently distant destinations, and are generally more bearable than a long car trip.

Embed from Getty Images

In many cases, however, there is a better way to travel, which is to take a train. There are several benefits to doing so. For instance, the drive to a train station is often much shorter than the one to an airport, and train tickets are nearly universally cheaper than plane tickets. You don’t have to go through security when boarding a train, nor do you have to deal with long waits in airports, and selections for food and beverages are often better. Also, trains happen to be a more environmentally-friendly form of transportation than planes, which have recently been found to pollute more than previously thought, and cell phone reception on trains is generally better than at airports and in the air. Of course, for sufficiently long distances, taking a plane can be your only option, but for a trip that would take one hour by plane it may be a better idea to take a five-hour long train trip when all factors are taken into consideration.

The quality of the time you spend on a train is often better than the time you spend in the air travel process, as you often have more legroom and opportunities for relaxation or work.

One such factor is the hidden additional time it takes to fly beyond the time spent in the air. Regardless of how long your trip to the airport is, you generally have to wait at least a few hours in the airport before boarding the plane, and it’s always recommended to arrive extra early as a precaution. The disembarking process also takes time, as you find your luggage while navigating an unfamiliar airport, and then you’ll often have to wait to be picked up by a taxi service or a relative. All of this time adds up, and a one-hour flight can quickly become a five-hour affair, making a train trip of similar duration more appealing. Furthermore, the quality of the time you spend on a train is often better than the time you spend in the air travel process, as you often have more legroom and opportunities for relaxation or work.

The New York Times writer Elaine Glusac compared details of traveling between various popular Americans cities by train and by plane in order to test the theory that train trips are often more desirable than plane trips. Her results, surprisingly, argued that for many trips we tend to imagine as necessitating air travel, trains were a superior form of transport. The trip from Boston to New York City, for instance, is both cheaper and faster by train than by airplane, as is the trip from New York City to Washington. The trip from Boston to Washington, however, is a better deal by plane. The trip from Seattle to Vancouver, British Columbia, was recently made easier by the signing of an agreement between the United States and Canada to allow travellers to clear customs and immigration before leaving a country, and taking a train instead of a plane allows travelers to save both time and money on this trip.

Embed from Getty Images

With the advent of the Internet, it’s never been easier to do research on travel opportunities. One popular online resource is Hipmunk, which allows users to input the details of their journey to compare prices and travel times between different airlines and automatically includes details for taking a train instead. Before embarking on any trip, you should look into the various rules and restrictions of your travel method of choice, as both airlines and planes impose limitations on the size and type of luggage you can carry, among other rules. When planning a trip, make sure you take all eventualities into consideration, as a thoroughly-planned trip is much likelier to be a successful one than a spontaneous journey.

Millennials Buying Home

Millennials Face Difficulties Affording Homes

/in , /by

For many Americans, a key part of the American Dream is the ability to save enough money to afford a home. But for millennials, many of whom are currently at a point in their lives where they’d like to move out of their parents’ house or their apartment and own a piece of real estate, a number of factors can make this dream seem to be an impossibility. According to the Urban Institute, just 37% of millennials owned homes in 2015, down eight percentage points from Gen Xers and Baby Boomers when they were a similar age. If millennials owned homes at the same rate as previous generations, there would be around 3.4 million more homeowners today. And although 9 out of 10 millennial renters would like to purchase a home, only 4.9 percent say they plan to do so in the next year, and 34 percent anticipate waiting five years or more before being able to buy real estate. Among millennials who want to own a home but are unable to do so, 3 out of 4 cite affordability as the reason, with many citing a lack of savings for a down payment and the burden of student loans as contributing factors.

Embed from Getty Images

The causes for millennials’ problems affording homes are multifaceted. Whereas many Baby Boomers were able to attend public colleges and universities without having to pay for tuition, most Millennials did not have the same luxury, instead having to borrow tremendous amounts of money to pay for educational costs which, despite offering a value which has remained stagnant over the past several decades, have grown substantially faster than the rate of inflation. Because a higher percentage of millennials attended university than previous generations, the value of a college degree has diminished, as employers have a wide variety of choices for hiring well-educated candidates. And while millennials’ paychecks have roughly the same purchasing power as those of Americans living 40 years ago, the average cost of housing has more than doubled in that time. It has been estimated that, at the current rate, it will take the majority of millennials twenty years to save enough money for a down payment.

The financial burdens imposed on millennials dreaming of owning a home extend beyond stagnant wages and student loan debt. The cost of renting an apartment is substantially greater than it used to be, and because of the generation’s difficulty earning money, financial institutions are more reluctant to grant credit to millennials, with 58 percent of millennials being denied credit, compared to 35 percent of prior generations. Millennials are also less likely to own stocks than other generations were, as a result of having come of age during the Great Recession and becoming skeptical of the stock market as a result, causing many millennials to miss out on some of the major benefits of the recent economic boom. As a result of these economic problems, some forecasters predict that real estate agents will have difficulty selling houses in the future, as millennials replace Baby Boomers as the country’s largest generation.

Embed from Getty Images

Other factors discouraging millennials from homeownership are also at play. Millennials are the most racially diverse of any current American generation, and homeownership is more valued culturally among caucasians. Additionally, millennials are waiting longer than their parents and grandparents to get married and have children, as the marriage rate among young people has dropped from 52 percent in 1990 to 39 percent in 2015, delaying the urgency of owning a home. Also, millennials tend to prefer to live in cities more so than prior generations, where the cost of living is higher and purchasing a house is out of the question. As a result of economic changes over the past several decades, the demographic among millennials most likely to own a home are those who can earn more due to having a college education and come from a wealthy background, as they can borrow money from their parents to supplement the cost of a down payment. As houses are frequently the most valuable financial assets Americans own, not owning a house has a negative impact in a person’s overall ability to accumulate wealth over time. Additionally, intergenerational transfer of homes is likely to increase wealth disparity between races of millennials, as minorities are less likely to own and be able to inherit homes.

Though these prospects seem grim, a number of solutions have been proposed to help with the problem of home affordability among the younger generation. One proposed solution is to invest in programs teaching young people about the finances of homeownership, encouraging people to start saving up for a home from a younger age and increasing awareness of programs designed to help people afford homes. Another proposal is to update the criteria that creditors use to evaluate millennials’ suitability for loans, taking into account their rental, telecom, and utility payments. In any case, whether you’re interested in buying a home soon or not, it’s always a good idea to make sure you’re keeping good track of your finances and have a smart, realistic plan for your future.