Posts

insulin

FTC Suing Pharmacy Benefit Managers Over High Insulin Costs For Patients 

Millions of individuals living with diabetes need insulin in order to survive. In America, the cost of the essential drug has forced patients to pay extreme prices, despite the fact that it’s not that expensive to actually make. To combat this ongoing issue, the federal government is going after a major part of the pharmaceutical industry that is involved in the high insulin pricing. 

In a lawsuit that was filed last Friday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is bringing action against pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs). Specifically, the FTC is going after some of the nation’s top PBMs: CVS Health’s Caremark Rx, Cigna’s Express Scripts, and United Health Group’s OptumRx. 

According to reports from NPR, the FTC is stating that these companies created and implemented a “perverse drug rebate system” that works to inflate the cost of insulin artificially. The goal from the FTC is to win the trial which would lead to the cost of insulin to decrease. The FTC posted a press release on Friday regarding the suit and the purpose behind it. 

Embed from Getty Images

“Even when lower list price insulins became available that could have been more affordable for vulnerable patients, the PBMs systemically excluded them in favor of high list price, highly rebated insulin products.”

PBMs are described as the “middlemen” between drug manufacturers and insurance providers. Their job is to essentially reduce drug prices, however, many critics, and now the FTC, is stating that they’re driving up prices for patients. 

In their release, the FTC stated that the revenue PBM earns is attached to “rebates and fees,” which are determined by the drug’s price. Meaning, in this case specifically, when insulin costs more, it generates more rebates and fees, and therefore more revenue for the PGMs. 

The three PBMs that the FTC has named in their suit make up around 80% of the market. According to the lawsuit, “the PBMs collected billions of dollars in rebates and fees while insulin became increasingly unaffordable.”

Within the past 20 years, the cost of insulin has increased by 600%. Many Americans living with diabetes have turned to rationing their medicine in order to avoid putting their lives and health at risk. According to the FTC, in 2019 around 25% of insulin patients were not able to afford their medication.  

“Caremark, ESI, and Optum—as medication gatekeepers—have extracted millions of dollars off the backs of patients who need life-saving medications,” said Rahul Rao, Deputy Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition. 

Embed from Getty Images

“Millions of Americans with diabetes need insulin to survive, yet for many of these vulnerable patients, their insulin drug costs have skyrocketed over the past decade thanks in part to powerful PBMs and their greed.”

“The FTC’s administrative action seeks to put an end to the Big Three PBMs’ exploitative conduct and marks an important step in fixing a broken system—a fix that could ripple beyond the insulin market and restore healthy competition to drive down drug prices for consumers,” Rao said. 

Representatives from all three PBMs named in the suit all denied the claims made in the FTC’s suit. 

“[The FTC suit] demonstrates a profound misunderstanding of how drug pricing works,” a United Health OptumRx spokesperson said. 

A CVS Caremark spokesperson said “the company is committed to protecting its clients from rising prescription drug prices and this is now a solved problem.”

Around 20 states in the US have passed laws, or created programs. to limit the pricing of insulin. In 2022, Congress passed the Inflation Reduction Act. The act capped out-of-pocket insulin costs for patients on Medicare. 

“[The investigation into PBMs] shed light on the concerning and active role that the three manufacturers have played in causing insulin to be unaffordable for many people with diabetes. The three companies further inflated their list price of their insulin products in response to the PBMs’ demand for higher rebates,” Rao said.

UK

One Third Of Households In The United Kingdom Facing Poverty Due To Rising Energy Costs 

According to campaigners from the United Kingdom, nearly one third of households in the nation will face poverty by the winter due to increasing energy costs and paying bills that are expected to rise in price even further with the new year. 

According to estimates from the End Fuel Poverty Coalition (EFPC), about 10.5 million households will be in “fuel poverty” for the first three months of 2023. In other words, based on their incomes after they’re done paying their energy bills their household income will fall below the poverty line. 

Embed from Getty Images

The definition of poverty in the UK is any household with an income of less than 60% of the UK median, which stands at £31,000 ($37,500), according to official statistics.

Cornwall Insight is the research firm that provided the data leading to the prediction that one third of households will be impoverished in the winter. The average energy bill is expected to hit £3,582 ($4,335) a year from October, and £4,266 ($5,163) from January; about £355 ($430) a month.

The forecast for 2023 represents a 116% increase in energy bills from their current levels. Fuel prices have been surging worldwide, and in the UK prices are projected to continue to rise by 83% in January. 

Embed from Getty Images

Cornwall Insight, however, also is expecting energy bills will start decreasing in the second half of 2023. The average household bill in the UK has risen by 54% this year due to inflation rates regarding fuel and energy consumption.

The UK government announced a bill in May which introduced a  £15 billion ($18 billion) package of support — including a “£400 ($484) payment to 29 million households from October — to ease the burden of energy bills.”

But Simon Francis, coordinator for the EFPC, said “the latest price estimates meant the current level of government support amounted to a drop in the ocean.”

Craig Lowrey, a principal consultant at Cornwall Insight, said in a Tuesday press release that “if £400 was not enough to make a dent in the impact of [the company’s] previous forecast, it most certainly is not enough now.”

Liz Truss, the UK’s foreign minister and as prime minister, has proposed “cutting taxes to help people struggling with their bills, rather than direct help.”