Posts

health insurance

San Francisco Firefighter Dies After Insurance Dispute Delayed Cancer Treatment

Ken Jones, a retired San Francisco firefighter who spent months fighting with his health insurer over access to cancer treatment, died Saturday at age 71.

Jones had been living with Stage 4 metastatic cancer and became the focus of a series of NBC Bay Area investigations examining his struggle with Blue Shield of California. The insurer twice denied treatment requested by Jones’ oncologist, a decision that sparked criticism from medical professionals, city officials, and fellow firefighters.

Blue Shield said in a statement that it was “deeply saddened” by Jones’ death and offered condolences to his wife, family, friends, and former colleagues at the San Francisco Fire Department.

Jones devoted 17 years to the department, serving not only as a firefighter but also as its lead counselor. In that role, he helped first responders navigate trauma, serious illness, and other personal crises.

Among those closest to him was former San Francisco Fire Chief Jeanine Nicholson, who had known Jones and his wife, Helen Horvath, for nearly three decades.

When Nicholson was diagnosed with breast cancer more than 10 years ago, Jones drove her to medical appointments for six months while she underwent treatment.

“Chemotherapy really is tough – it’s tough on your body because it’s killing all the good cells as well as the bad,” Nicholson said. “[Ken] had to suffer a lot through that, and then being denied further treatment— it’s just so cruel. It is so cruel.”

Nicholson believes the delays in Jones’ care had devastating consequences.

“I believe, wholeheartedly, that they expedited his death. They should be ashamed.”

Embed from Getty Images

At the center of the dispute was a disagreement over whether Jones should receive a specific combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Blue Shield has repeatedly maintained that its denials were not based on cost considerations but on medical guidelines that, according to the company, did not support the treatment regimen requested for Jones’ stage of cancer.

Jones’ oncologist, Dr. Matthew Gubens, strongly disagreed with that assessment.

Gubens, who heads the UC San Francisco Thoracic Medical Oncology Clinic and has helped develop some of the nation’s most widely used cancer treatment guidelines through the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, argued that Blue Shield misapplied those standards.

“There’s gray area in medicine,” Gubens previously told NBC Bay Area.

“The time spent trying to get approval of a regimen that I requested, [Ken] lost ground – tumors are growing, pain is increasing, his appetite is going down.”

After Blue Shield initially denied the treatment request, Gubens said he attempted to appeal the decision but struggled to reach the appropriate department within the company. He said repeated calls to the phone number listed in the denial letter led him in circles.

“I reached people who apologized, but they weren’t the right place to send the appeal to and often referred me back to the first person I talked to. That day, I spent about three hours calling different phone numbers for this insurance company.”

Embed from Getty Images

Blue Shield did not respond to earlier requests for comment regarding why Gubens was unable to connect with the proper contact to file an appeal.

Gubens eventually submitted a written appeal, but that request was also denied, creating what he described as a weeks-long delay in care.

“Any of our cancer treatments are harder to give and less effective the weaker a patient is when we’re seeing them,” he said.

The controversy surrounding Jones’ case drew the attention of San Francisco officials. Following NBC Bay Area’s reporting, members of the Board of Supervisors called on Blue Shield executives to appear at a City Hall hearing to explain the company’s claims review process and discuss reforms intended to ensure firefighters and other first responders can obtain timely medical care.

Blue Shield is one of three insurers contracted by the city to provide health coverage to more than 40,000 employees and retirees. According to data obtained from the San Francisco Health Service System, those contracts are worth more than $1 billion.

Jones’ death has also renewed attention on the health risks firefighters face. Research from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health found firefighters are diagnosed with cancer at rates roughly 9 percent higher than the general population and face a 14 percent greater risk of dying from the disease.

Exposure to smoke, soot, ash, and other hazardous materials has led the World Health Organization to classify occupational exposure in firefighting as a carcinogenic risk.

Despite Jones’ passing, discussions about potential reforms are expected to continue. Blue Shield is scheduled to meet next week with leaders of the local firefighters’ union and other advocates to discuss possible changes to the claims process.

City supervisors have also indicated they plan to bring Blue Shield executives back to City Hall to provide a public update on those efforts.

“We need to hold insurance companies accountable for their actions,” Nicholson said. “They are in the business of making money. They are not always in the business of giving people the best care or the care that they deserve.”

nyc

NYC Is One Of The Best Cities In The World, According To New Report

Every year, the Resonance Consultancy ranks the best cities in the world by analyzing over 270 cities and publishing a comprehensive list for the public to learn about some of the most famous cities in the world. 

Embed from Getty Images

The full report utilizes user-generated reviews, social media, online activity/popularity, and other statistics to create their rankings. 

According to Time Out Magazine and the report itself,  other “analyzed metrics include a wide range of factors that have historically shown positive correlations with attracting employment, investment and/or visitors to cities.”

The ninth annual report listed London as the best city in the world, followed by Paris and then New York. Tokyo and Singapore marked the fourth and fifth spots on the list. The US is also the only country with two cities in the top 10, with San Francisco being listed as number 7.

Written as “the greatest city in America” in an accompanying essay to the report, the study mentions “New York’s dizzying roster of new shows, hotels and parks” as part and parcel of its perennial appeal, despite the record real estate prices that have defined life in the city in recent years.”

According to Time Out Magazine, “In a nod to 2023 and 2024 in specific, the survey also mentions two key events that render New York the ideal destination at this precise moment in time: the celebrations surrounding the 50th anniversary of the birth of hip hop music, which was founded in the Bronx on August 11, 1973, and the 100-year anniversary of the Museum of the City of New York.”

Embed from Getty Images

The top 10 best cities in the world for 2024 are as follows: 

  1. London, UK
  2. Paris, France
  3. New York City, US
  4. Tokyo, Japan
  5. Sinagpore
  6. Dubai, United Arab Emirates
  7. San Francisco, US
  8. Barcelona, Spain
  9. Amsterdam, Netherlands
  10. Seoul, South Korea
Tiffany Pisoni

A Journey From Humble Beginnings to Multi-Venture Success in San Francisco’s Hospitality Scene | Tiffany Pisoni

In the heart of San Francisco’s vibrant culinary scene, where tastes, trends, and traditions converge, a remarkable individual has carved an extraordinary path to success. With a determination fueled by passion, creativity, and an unwavering commitment to her dreams, Tiffany Pisoni has risen from humble beginnings to owning two thriving restaurants, a flourishing catering business, and a successful dishware company. Her journey is a testament to the power of hard work, resilience, and an unyielding love for hospitality.

Homeless

Trump’s Targeting of Homeless Californians Just Another Battle in the Culture War

Donald Trump, apparently, has declared war on California. After the state, in cooperation with automotive companies, developed its own set of regulations on carbon emissions in response to the E.P.A.’s planned rollback of goals for automotive manufacturers to improve gas mileage, Trump took action to try to limit California’s authority to set environmental regulations, stymieing the state’s plan. Fueled by apparent anger towards the liberal state, Trump also recently took the bizarre step of pressuring the E.P.A. to declare California’s homeless population an environmental risk. Of course, it is shockingly obvious that the population in question pose no such threat whatsoever, and this political pressure has no basis in reality. The truth, in fact, is the opposite: homeless people both contribute the least of any population to climate change, which is the primary environmental concern, and suffer the most from its effects, as their capacity to find shelter during extreme weather events and migrate to more habitable areas is extremely limited. Rather, Trump’s decision to berate the homeless, blaming them for an issue they clearly have nothing to do with, is simply part of a pattern of behavior in which the President cruelly exploits the disenfranchised for his own political and personal ends.

This tactic is useful for authoritarian leaders such as Trump. A political coalition which is united against a common enemy is a powerful one, and the easiest enemies to unite against are those who do not have political, social, and economic power. Whether it’s a deliberate strategy on Trump’s part or a manifestation of his psychological pathology, the demonization of minority groups has been the Trump campaign theory since the beginning. The idea of the wall on the southern border has always drawn its power from being a symbol of the strength granted by minority oppression, and the US’s policy of deliberate cruelty towards immigrants serves as evidence of this political theory. While his targeting of Hispanic immigrants is the most obvious, Trump has also gone after other minority groups, infamously claiming there were “some fine people on both sides” of a deadly incident in Charlottesville involving a group of white nationalist protestors, and taking executive action in an attempt to limit the number of Muslim immigrants shortly after assuming the presidency.

Embed from Getty Images

The White House claims that San Francisco’s homelessness problem breaks environmental rules because used needles, originating in homeless communities, wind up in the ocean. San Francisco’s mayor, London Breed, was quick to refute this claim, citing the city’s advanced sewer system which prevents debris from flowing into the bay. The mayor also described how the city was already committed to helping homeless people, noting that the city was investing in improving homeless shelters, affordable housing, and programs to help people with mental illnesses and drug addiction. Meanwhile, under Trump, the Department of Housing and Urban Development is imposing additional limits on federal public housing opportunities, and in interviews Trump has shown his sympathies lie more with the taxpayers and others who have to deal with the problems created by homeless people rather than the homeless themselves, suggesting the real victims of the problem are people like police officers who catch diseases from the homeless. Any apparent concern Trump has for homeless people is at best insincere, or more likely a political ploy to demonize a vulnerable and underserved population for political ends.

By issuing claims that are, by their very nature, fundamentally and obviously anti-truth, Trump and his administration are asserting political dominance over facts themselves

From this perspective, the motivations behind Trump’s newest target become clear. By associating California with homelessness, Trump attempts to illustrate the failure of liberal politicians and policies, bolstering his oppositional political position. Because they are an easy target, homeless people are exploitable for the purpose of consolidating authoritarian power. Californian politicians are in the uncomfortable position of agreeing with Trump on the nature of the issue of widespread homelessness but disagreeing about potential solutions to the problem. Given Trump’s temperament and the nature of the political theory that drives his behavior, it is unlikely that any proposed solutions from the White House will actually involve benefiting the homeless. Rather, the White House supports a plan to move homeless people into the government’s care, which sounds appropriate until you consider the overcrowded, unsanitary, and inhumane conditions of these facilities. The cruelty, of course, is the point, as Trump sees this posturing towards California as a means by which to punish the liberal state, just as he views the cruelty of detention centers as a punishment for illegal immigration.

Embed from Getty Images

The fact that the belief that homeless people are an environmental threat is not only clearly false, but also the opposite of the truth, is also the point. By issuing claims that are, by their very nature, fundamentally and obviously anti-truth, Trump and his administration are asserting political dominance over facts themselves, a useful position in the establishment of a totalitarian state. Similar political behavior, in which government agencies present the opposite of truth as truth itself, was used to great effect during the rise of fascism in Europe in the 20th century and is chronicled in George Orwell’s famous dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty Four. In an authoritarian state, the various branches of government are gradually repurposed to serve as instruments with which tyrants can destroy their opposition; this is seen in the E.P.A.’s abandonment of concerns about climate change in favor of punishing homeless people, just as it is in N.O.A.A.’s knowingly false assertion that a hurricane was originally forecast to hit Alabama after the President said it was. In the culture war between the two major political parties, which Donald Trump deliberately stokes for political gain, the least privileged and culpable are the most victimized.

Featured image credit: Garry Knight, “Homeless by a Wall.