meta

US Senators Call For Scam Ads On Facebook And Instagram To Be Investigated 

US senators Josh Hawley and Richard Blumenthal are calling on the heads of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to open an investigation regarding revenue made from ads on Facebook and Instagram that are promoting scams and banned goods. 

Embed from Getty Images

“The FTC and SEC should immediately open investigations and, if the reporting is accurate, pursue vigorous enforcement action where appropriate to force Meta to disgorge profits, pay penalties and agree to cease running such advertisements,” both Hawley and Blumenthal wrote to the federal agencies.

It was reported earlier this month that internal documents from late 2024 stated that Meta was projected to earn 10% of its overall revenue from illicit advertising, which equated to around $16 billion. One document stated that Meta earned around $3.5 billion in revenue from “higher risk” scam advertisements every six months. 

Documents also stated that Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, has anti-fraud rules that don’t apply to a lot of these advertisements. 

In response to the report, which came from Reuters, Meta stated that they reduced user reports of scams by 58% throughout the last 18 months.  

Meta spokesman, Andy Stone, said:

 “[The Hawley-Blumenthal letter] makes claims that are exaggerated and wrong, we aggressively fight fraud and scams because people on our platforms don’t want this content, legitimate advertisers don’t want it and we don’t want it either.”

Embed from Getty Images

Both Hawley and Blumenthal expressed their skepticism over Meta’s work to combat illicit advertising, pointing out the company’s “ad library,” which is a publicly accessible database of advertising on Meta’s social media platforms. 

“Even a short review of Meta’s Ad Library at the time of this letter shows clearly identifiable advertisements for illicit gambling, payment scams, crypto scams, AI deepfake sex services, and fake offers of federal benefits,” they said

“Scams have been allowed to take over Facebook and Instagram as Meta has drastically cut its safety staff, including for FTC mandated reviews, even as it dumps unimaginable sums into its generative AI projects.”

“While Meta has been warned about advertisement deepfakes impersonating politicians, it still continues to run fraudulent clips,” their letter writes

“The beneficiaries of these scams are often cybercrime groups based in China, Sri Lanka, Vietnam and the Philippines.”

chatgpt

Multiple US Lawsuits Accuse ChatGPT Of Acting As ‘Suicide Coach’

ChatGPT is being accused of acting as a “suicide coach” in a series of lawsuits filed this week. The suits allege that interactions with the AI chatbot have led to severe mental breakdowns and several deaths, according to reports

There is a total of seven lawsuits that cite allegations of wrongful death, assisted suicide, involuntary manslaughter, negligence, and product liability. 

Embed from Getty Images

According to a joint statement from the Social Media Victims Law Center and Tech Justice Law Project, each of the seven plaintiffs initially were using ChatGPT for “general help with schoolwork, research, writing, recipes, work, or spiritual guidance.”

“Over time the chatbot evolved into a psychologically manipulative presence, positioning itself as a confidant and emotional support.

Rather than guiding people toward professional help when they needed it ChatGPT reinforced harmful delusions, and, in some cases, acted as a ‘suicide coach.’”

An OpenAI spokesperson, which makes ChatGPT, stated:

“This is an incredibly heartbreaking situation, and we’re reviewing the filings to understand the details.

We train ChatGPT to recognize and respond to signs of mental or emotional distress, de-escalate conversations, and guide people toward real-world support.

We continue to strengthen ChatGPT’s responses in sensitive moments, working closely with mental health clinicians.”

One of the cases regards Zane Shamblin, a resident of Texas who took his own life at the age of 23. His family has alleged that ChatGPT worsened his emotional state and emphasized his isolation while encouraging him to ignore loved ones. 

The complaint stated that during a four-hour exchange with ChatGPT, the chatbot “repeatedly glorified suicide,” telling him “that he was strong for choosing to end his life and sticking with his plan,” and “asked him if he was ready,” while only referring to  the suicide hotline once.

ChatGPT also allegedly complimented Shamblin on his suicide note. 

Embed from Getty Images

Another case regards Amaurie Lacey of Georgia whose family has claimed that several weeks before 17-year-old Lacey took his life, he used ChatGPT for help, leading him to “addiction, depression, and eventually counseled [Lacey] on the most effective way to tie a noose and how long he would be able to ‘live without breathing.’”

26-year-old Joshua Enneking’s relatives stated that he used ChatGPT for help as well but “was instead encouraged to act upon a suicide plan” by “validating” his dark thoughts and engaging “with him in graphic discussions about the aftermath of his death, offered to help him write his suicide note, [and] after having had extensive conversations with him about his depression and suicidal ideation” helped guide him about how to purchase a gun.

All of the individuals named within the lawsuits reportedly used ChatGPT-40, a model of the chatbot which OpenAI has previously been accused of rushing to release “despite internal warnings that the product was dangerously sycophantic and psychologically manipulative” and of prioritizing “user engagement over user safety.”

The plaintiffs are seeking damages, product changes, mandatory reporting to emergency contacts when users express suicide ideation, automatic conversation termination when self-harm or suicide methods are discussed, and other protective safety measures. 

OpenAI said it had worked with “more than 170 mental health experts to help ChatGPT more reliably recognize signs of distress, respond with care, and guide people toward real-world support–reducing responses.”

If you or a loved one is struggling and you’re in the US, you can call or text the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 or chat at 988lifeline.org

For a full list of international suicide hotlines, click here.

copilot

Microsoft’s New “Mico” Assistant Revives the Spirit of Clippy for the AI Era

Nearly three decades after the beloved, and at times despised, paperclip named Clippy first blinked to life in Microsoft Office, the tech giant is trying once again to give your computer a face or, at least, a personality. This time, meet Mico, a new animated character for Copilot’s voice mode, designed to be as expressive as it is helpful.

“We all live in Clippy’s shadow in some sense,” Jacob Andreou, corporate VP of product and growth at Microsoft AI, told The Verge. “Clippy walked so that we could run.”

After Clippy’s tenure ended in 2001 with Office XP, Microsoft spent years experimenting with new forms of digital assistants. Cortana, introduced on Windows Phone in 2014, was the company’s next big bet, but despite its potential, the AI technology of the time couldn’t live up to the vision. Cortana quietly faded out, with its app discontinued on Windows 11 just a couple of years ago.

Now, Mico represents Microsoft’s modern attempt to rekindle that human-machine connection, one built for a world already familiar with Alexa, Siri, and ChatGPT.

Embed from Getty Images

Mico has been quietly in testing for months. Unlike the static paperclip of yesteryear, it’s responsive, real-time, like a glowing orb that shifts as you talk.

“You can see it. It reacts as you speak to it, and if you talk about something sad, you’ll see its facial expressions react almost immediately. All the technology fades into the background, and you just start talking to this cute orb and build this connection with it.”

By default, Mico will appear in Copilot’s voice mode, though for the shy or skeptical, you can toggle it off. It’s launching first in the US, UK, and Canada, and it will take advantage of Copilot’s new memory system, which allows it to recall information it’s learned about you and your projects.

Beyond conversation, Microsoft wants Mico to become a guide. A new “Learn Live” feature transforms it into what the company calls a “Socratic tutor.” Instead of just providing answers, Mico leads users through concepts, using interactive whiteboards and visual prompts to encourage deeper understanding, something Microsoft hopes will appeal to students cramming for finals or adults tackling new skills, such as a language.

Embed from Getty Images

Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman hinted earlier this year that giving Copilot a recognizable personality was a key part of the company’s vision.

“Copilot will certainly have a kind of permanent identity, a presence, and it will have a room that it lives in, and it will age. I’m really interested in this idea of digital patina. The things I love in my world are the things that are a little bit worn or rubbed down, and have scuff marks. Unfortunately, in the digital world, we don’t have a sense of age.”

Mico is also the star of Microsoft’s newest marketing push, with TV spots promoting Windows 11 PCs as “the computer you can talk to.” The company hopes this will help normalize the idea of speaking to your PC, something previous efforts like Cortana couldn’t quite achieve.

Of course, Microsoft knows nostalgia is a powerful tool. For all its new capabilities, Mico doesn’t entirely escape the long, animated shadow of Clippy. “It’s funny you mention Clippy; there is an Easter egg when you get to try Mico. If you poke Mico very, very quickly, something special may happen,” Andreou revealed.

Mico may look nothing like that bug-eyed paperclip, but the mission remains to make technology feel more like a companion.

aws

Mass Internet Disruption as Amazon Web Services Suffers Multi-Hour Outage

For a few tense hours early Monday morning, much of the internet stumbled. From payment apps to streaming platforms to government websites, an outage at Amazon Web Services (AWS) temporarily silenced corners of the digital world, offering another reminder of how deeply our online lives depend on a handful of tech giants.

The disruption began around 3 a.m. Eastern Time, hitting a wide range of popular services, including Venmo, Hulu, Snapchat, the chat app Signal, and parts of the British government’s online infrastructure. Even Amazon’s own website wasn’t immune. By 5:27 a.m., the company said most affected systems were back online, though it was still “working through a backlog of queued requests.”

While the disruption lasted just over two hours, its reach was enormous. Banks, gaming platforms, and entertainment services all reported interruptions. Users struggled to access various services, including WhatsApp, Coinbase, The New York Times’ puzzle games, Ring doorbells, and McDonald’s ordering systems. American Airlines and Delta Airlines were also affected.

“United [Airlines] implemented back-up systems to end the technology disruption and our teams are working to get our customers on their way,” the company said in a statement.

Amazon initially attributed the failure to an “operational issue” centered in its Northern Virginia region, known internally as “us-east-1,” one of the company’s largest data centers.

There was no immediate indication that the outage was caused by a cyberattack. But the precise cause remained unclear as the company worked to restore full functionality.

Experts said the incident highlights how much of the internet’s infrastructure rests on the shoulders of just a few major cloud providers—Amazon, Microsoft, and Google, among them. When one stumbles, millions of users and entire industries can be caught in the digital crossfire.

Embed from Getty Images

“So much of the world now relies on these three or four big (cloud) compute companies who provide the underlying infrastructure that when there’s an issue like this, it can be really impactful across a broad range, a broad spectrum” of online services, Patrick Burgess, a cybersecurity expert at U.K.-based BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT, told The Associated Press.

Harry Halpin, chief executive of NymVPN, a virtual private network company, told The New York Times that this was the consequence of an unstable and monopolized system.

“If your entire nation’s infrastructure relies on a few providers, all in the United States, and anything can go down at any moment, either for malicious reasons or just technical errors, that’s an exceedingly dangerous situation.”

Dr. Halpin, who previously worked as a research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said he awoke to messages from Ukrainian soldiers, who use his company’s VPN services, asking why communications had failed. “Everyone takes it for normal,” he said. “But it’s not normal.”

He speculated that a technical fault in one of Amazon’s main data centers may have been to blame, though he added that cloud platforms’ operations are inherently opaque, making it impossible to confirm without Amazon’s disclosure.

The outage reignited debate about the concentration of power within the cloud computing industry. Corinne Cath-Speth, head of digital for Article 19, a free speech advocacy group, warned that the failure underscored the risks of over-centralization.

“When a single provider goes dark, critical services go offline with it. The infrastructure underpinning democratic discourse, independent journalism and secure communications cannot be dependent on a handful of companies.”

Embed from Getty Images

Amro Al-Said Ahmad, a computer science lecturer at Keele University in England, echoed the concern, noting that “for everyday operations, cloud computing works.” But he added that even one small error, like a faulty update, can take down the entire system.

Last year, a daylong global outage caused by a faulty software update from cybersecurity company CrowdStrike crippled systems worldwide, another sign of the web’s fragility when critical infrastructure falters.

For many organizations, outsourcing data storage and computing to cloud providers like Amazon offers flexibility, cost savings, and scalability. AWS powers thousands of companies across industries, providing the backbone for video streaming, data analysis, and online transactions. In the first half of this year, the division accounted for nearly 20 percent of Amazon’s total sales but generated about 60 percent of its operating profit.

Still, despite the scope of the disruption, investors barely flinched. Amazon’s stock price held steady in premarket trading, perhaps a sign that, in the modern internet economy, occasional outages are simply accepted as the price of convenience.

Some political leaders are growing less comfortable with that trade-off. Alexandra Geese, a member of the European Parliament from Germany, called the incident “a stark reminder that Europe’s digital sovereignty is not an abstract concept, but a matter of security and resilience.”

She and others are urging European nations to host critical infrastructure on home soil under E.U. jurisdiction, reducing dependence on U.S.-based corporations.

Two decades ago, most companies operated their own data centers. But as Mehdi Daoudi, founder of the internet monitoring firm Catchpoint, noted, today, most rely on Amazon, Google, Microsoft or Chinese companies for cloud services. Rising costs have recently prompted some organizations to reconsider that model and bring their infrastructure back in-house.

Whether Monday’s outage will accelerate that trend remains to be seen. For now, it stands as another wake-up call in a string of digital disruptions, showcasing the precarious position of many of our information systems.

“The good news is that this kind of issue is usually relatively fast (to resolve),” and there’s no indication that it was caused by a cyber incident like a cyberattack, Burgess told The Associated Press.

“This looks like a good old-fashioned technology issue, something’s gone wrong, and it will be fixed by Amazon,” he said.

windows

Microsoft Ends Support for Windows 10: Millions Urged to Upgrade

A major shift is on the horizon for millions of PC users. Today, Microsoft will officially stop supporting Windows 10, ending nearly a decade of updates for one of the world’s most widely used operating systems.

Once that happens, Windows 10 devices will no longer receive security patches or bug fixes, leaving them increasingly exposed to cyber threats. Microsoft is urging users to make the jump to Windows 11, but not everyone can.

“The end of support for Windows 10 is shaping up to be a disaster for both consumers and the environment,” Nathan Proctor, senior director at U.S. consumer advocacy group PIRG, told the BBC. “We deserve tech that lasts,” Proctor, who also campaigns for the “right to repair” in the U.S, added.

Despite being nearly ten years old, Windows 10 remains a dominant player. Microsoft estimates that its software runs on more than 1.4 billion devices worldwide, and roughly 43% of them were still using Windows 10 as of mid-2025, according to Statcounter.

Inside the UK, consumer watchdog Which? Tech magazine believes as many as 21 million people could be affected by the change. Its September survey found one in four users planned to keep using Windows 10 past the deadline, while one in seven expected to buy a new computer.

Embed from Getty Images

Lisa Barber, the magazine’s editor, cautioned that criminals “are going to target people, they are going to exploit weaknesses and they are going to want to steal your data.” Proctor and other consumer advocates also believe the upgrade could fuel unnecessary waste as working devices get scrapped.

“People are tired of living in a world filled with short-lived devices we can’t fix, or lose software support, or are otherwise forced into the waste stream.”

Without updates, Windows 10 machines won’t get new protections against viruses, ransomware, or malicious software.

Microsoft is offering two paths forward. You can either upgrade to Windows 11, which is free for those with compatible hardware, or sign up for extended security updates. This temporary patch program extends vital security coverage until October 2026.

Microsoft’s Yusuf Mehdi, Consumer Chief Marketing Officer, cautioned that companies may “find it challenging to maintain regulatory compliance with unsupported software.”

“Looking ahead, 2025 marks an important milestone for Windows. We saw the spirit of innovation on full display at CES in January, as the Windows ecosystem came together to unveil breakthrough technologies and introduce new Windows 11 and Copilot+ PCs. And that momentum is only growing, as new silicon technology, thoughtful hardware designs and on-device AI experiences give people more of a reason to upgrade their Windows PC. With AI becoming a more natural and helpful part of everyday life, 2025 continues to emerge as the year of the Windows 11 PC refresh.”

Embed from Getty Images

Software developers are also likely to phase out compatibility over time, meaning older PCs could lose access to new features or apps.

“Many people will have to purchase new devices — despite the fact that their current computers work just fine.”

Windows 11, released in 2021, raised the bar for hardware requirements, especially around TPM 2.0 security chips, leaving many older PCs behind. It also prompts users to sign in with a Microsoft account, a change that some users find intrusive due to privacy concerns.

Even for those willing to upgrade, the process requires backing up data, verifying hardware compatibility, and potentially adjusting to a new interface.

Launched in 2015, Windows 10 was promoted as “the last version of Windows,” with rolling updates expected to keep it current indefinitely. For ten years, Microsoft issued regular updates that introduced new tools, accessibility improvements, and crucial security patches.

Now, as the curtain falls, millions face a decision whether to pay for short-term protection, buy a new device, or take their chances with an unpatched system.

instagram

Facebook And Instagram Will Charge UK Users For Ad-Free Versions Of The Platforms 

Meta has announced that Facebook and Instagram users in the United Kingdom will now be offered ad-free versions of the platforms if they pay a monthly fee up to £3.99 ($5.37) a month.

This announcement comes from Mark Zuckerberg as a response to regulatory warnings about personalized advertisements which are generated by using users’ data placed in an algorithm to produce targeted ads. The ad-free subscription service gives users the option to get out of targeted ads. 

Embed from Getty Images

Reports indicate that web users will be charged £2.99 ($4.02) a month and mobile users will be charged £3.99 ($5.37) a month to scroll through Facebook and Instagram without seeing advertisements. 

Additionally, if accounts are linked, users will only need to pay one monthly fee. In a statement, Meta stated

“This will give people based in the UK the choice between continuing to use Facebook and Instagram for free with personalized ads, or subscribing to stop seeing ads.”

Users who opt not to pay the monthly fee will continue to see advertisements on their pages as usual. In their statement, Meta said the paid tier services will be rolled out throughout the upcoming weeks. 

This new subscription model is very similar to one that already exists between Meta and the European Union. However, the EU deemed that policy in breach of the digital markets act by the European Commission. The digital markets act is a piece of legislation that was designed to crack down on the overwhelming power big tech holds. 

The commission fined Meta €200 million ($235,125,380) this year after claims that the company could, and should, have released a free version of their sites that utilized less personal data including the users gender, age, and location, to be used to make targeted ads. 

Embed from Getty Images

The Informational Commissioner’s Office is the UK’s data watchdog, and they stated that they support the move from Meta. 

“This moves Meta away from targeting users with ads as part of the standard terms and conditions for using its Facebook and Instagram services, which we’ve been clear is not in line with UK law,” said an ICO spokesperson according to the Guardian

The ICO stated this year that internet and Meta users should have the option to “opt out” of their personal data being used to create and push targeted ads. This statement came after Meta settled a court case with a UK citizen regarding targeted advertisements. 

More specifically, Meta agreed in the court case to stop targeting Tanya O’Carroll, a human rights campaigner who alleged that the company breached UK data laws by neglecting to respect her right to demand that Facebook stop collecting her data for the sake of personalized ads. 

After the lawsuit and settlement, Meta announced it was considering creating and implementing an ad-free subscription service to its social networks. 

Gareth Oldale, a partner at UK law firm TLT, stated that the ICO’s support for the new subscription service from Meta exemplifies a divergence between the EU and UK. 

“This position is certainly pro-business and illustrative of the UK government’s direction to regulators to support economic growth and development of the digital economy,” he said. “It does, however, mean that the divergence between the UK and the EU positions has grown a little wider.”

tiktok

TikTok To Remain Operational In The US After Deal With China Is Reached 

The Trump administration announced this week that a deal has officially been reached with China to keep TikTok operational in the United States, after a yearlong effort that began back when Trump was in office for his first term, CNN reports. 

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in Madrid this week that a framework agreement has been reached, and Trump is set to speak with Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Friday in order to finalize the deal. 

“President Trump played a role in this, we had a call with him last night, we had specific guidance from him and we shared it with our Chinese counterparts. Without his leadership and the leverage he provides, we would not have been able to include the deal today,” Bessent said.

Embed from Getty Images

The Trump administration did not specifically name the US-backed buyer, but it’s expected to be the Oracle executive chairman Larry Ellison. Back in January, Trump stated that he would “champion” Ellison in buying TikTok’s US assets. 

Both Chinese and US diplomats have been holding meetings in Spain this week to hold trade discussions and talk about other matters. Bessent is leading the latest rounds of talks, and emphasized how TikTok was one of the major subjects being addressed. 

“We were very focused on TikTok and making sure that it was a deal that is fair for the Chinese and completely respects US national security concerns, and that’s the deal we reached,” said US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.

“Of course, we want to ensure that the Chinese have a fair, invested environment in the United States, but always that US national security comes first.”

China’s top trade negotiator and vice minister of commerce, Li Chenggang, stated that the US and China held “candid and in-depth exchanges,” and have reached a “basic framework consensus” in order to keep TikTok operational in America. 

The framework includes “resolving TikTok-related issues through cooperation, reducing investment barriers, and promoting-relevant economic and trade cooperation,” Li told the media in Madrid. 

Deputy director of China’s Cyberspace Administration, Wang Jingtao, stated that the deal could also include methods that would ensure entrusted operation of TikTok’s US user data and intellectual property rights, David Goldman of CNN reports. 

Throughout the year, Trump has extended a self-imposed deadline to reach a deal with China so that ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, would sell at least part of the US’s TikTok business to an American-backed owner. 

Embed from Getty Images

On January 18th, TikTok briefly shut down in the US, but a day before Trump took office, January 19th, the president said he would sign an executive action to ensure US companies wouldn’t be punished for having TikTok on their app stores or servers. 

Once the order was signed on January 20th, the ban on TikTok in the US was delayed for 75 days. The deadline was extended again in June to September 17th, and was expected to be extended again. 

Many investment groups throughout the US have expressed their interest in purchasing TikTok throughout the year, including former LA Dodgers owner Frank McCourt and famous “Shark Tank” investor Kevin O’Leary. 

Despite the interest, TikTok in general is likely to cost in the tens of billions, which is why industry analysts are reporting someone like Ellison is more likely to lead the charge for purchasing, as he would lead a group of investors. Additionally, Oracle also has an established relationship with TikTok. 

In 2020, Oracle began hosting TikTok’s US data, and during Trump’s first administration, the company and social media platform briefly reached a deal of acquisition, but it was eventually blocked. 

CNN reported that US officials said a meeting between Trump and Xi wouldn’t be happening if there wasn’t a TikTok deal in place. The agreement would also make it more likely that both leaders will sit down in October when Trump visits Asia, the officials said. 

Regarding the deal, Trump posted online: “The big Trade Meeting in Europe between The United States of America, and China, has gone VERY WELL! It will be concluded shortly.”

“A deal was also reached on a ‘certain’ company that young people in our Country very much wanted to save. They will be very happy! I will be speaking to President Xi on Friday.”

ai

Australia’s Human Rights Commissioner Warns AI Could Worsen Racism And Sexism 

Australia’s human rights commissioner, Lorraine Finlay, is warning the risks of artificial intelligence and its impact on racism and sexism during a labor debate over how to respond to the rapidly developing technology. 

According to reports, Finlay stated that in the pursuit of advancing productivity from AI, it’s not worth it when it comes at the expense of discrimination, which is why it’s important for the world to put together proper regulations.

Finlay made the comments after Labor senator Michelle Ananda-Rajah called for Australian data to be “freed” to tech companies to prevent AI from perpetuating overseas biases and gain a greater reflection on Australian life and culture. 

Embed from Getty Images

Ananda-Rajah has stated her opposition to a dedicated AI act but also believes that content creators should be compensated for their work.

Next week the government is set to hold an economic summit where unions and industry figures will raise their concerns over copyright, privacy protections, and productivity gains from AI, reports state

Media and art groups all over the world have expressed their concern over the “rampant theft” of intellectual property from big tech companies who use content to train their AI models. Finlay said that a lack of transparency in what data AI is being trained on makes it even harder to identify which biases it could be creating. 

“Algorithmic bias means that bias and unfairness is built into the tools that we’re using, and so the decisions that result will reflect that bias,” she said.

“When you combine algorithmic bias with automation bias – which is where humans are more likely to rely on the decisions of machines and almost replace their own thinking – there’s a real risk that what we’re actually creating is discrimination and bias in a form where it’s so entrenched, we’re perhaps not even aware that it’s occurring.”

The Human Rights Commission has been advocating for an AI act since the technology first began advancing, specifically pushing for a Privacy Act and intensive testing for bias in AI tools. 

Finlay said: “The government should urgently establish new legislative guardrails. Bias testing and causing, ensuring proper human oversight review, you [do] need those variety of different measures in place.”

An Australian study published in May found that there is growing evidence that there is bias in AI tools in Australia in areas such as medicine and job recruitment. The study found that job candidates interviewed by AI recruiters were at risk of being discriminated against if they spoke with an accent or were living with a disability, the Guardian reported

“AI must be trained on as much data as possible from as wide a population as possible or it will amplify biases, potentially harming the very people it is meant to serve,” Ananda-Rajah said.

“We need to free our own data in order to train the models so that they better represent us. I’m keen to monetize content creators while freeing the data. I think we can present an alternative to the pillage and plunder overseas.”

Embed from Getty Images

Ananda-Rajah continued to say that the way in which we can overcome any bias or discrimination against certain patients would be “to train these models on as much diverse data from Australia as possible.” 

Finlay added that any release of Australian data should be done in an unbiased way, but we first need proper regulations put in place. 

“Having diverse and representative data is absolutely a good thing … but it’s only one part of the solution,” she said.

“We need to make sure that this technology is put in place in a way that’s fair to everybody and actually recognizes the work and the contributions that humans are making.”

AI expert and former data researcher at an AI company, Judith Bishop, said that “we have to be careful that a system that was initially developed in other contexts is actually applicable for the [Australian] population, that we’re not relying on US models which have been trained on US data.”

Julie Inman Grant, the eSafety commissioner, also expressed her concern over the lack of transparency around the data AI utilizes. 

“The opacity of generative AI development and deployment is deeply problematic,” Inman Grant said. 

“This raises important questions about the extent to which LLMs [large language models] could amplify, even accelerate, harmful biases – including narrow or harmful gender norms and racial prejudices.”

“With the development of these systems concentrated in the hands of a few companies, there’s a real risk that certain bodies of evidence, voices and perspectives could be overshadowed or sidelined in generative outputs.”

ai band

Popular Band Admits That They’re AI-Generated After Two Albums And 1 Million Plays 

Hot new band The Velvet Sundown has risen in popularity throughout the past few weeks. They’ve earned over one million streams on Spotify with the release of two albums. Now, the band is making headlines after admitting that all of the music, promotional images, backstory, and artistry that’s been consumed by the public was generated by artificial intelligence. 

Music industry insiders are now having a very public debate, and warning listeners, over the authenticity of the work itself. According to reports, insiders believe that streaming platforms and the individuals responsible for creating music with AI should be required to disclose the use of the technology in relation to the work. 

Embed from Getty Images

Insiders are upset that the “band” was also denying the use of AI to create their work. The “band” described their work as “a synthetic music project guided by human creative direction,” which industry heads are pointing out to be obviously misleading. 

The discovery of the use of AI came about when an individual who described themselves as an “adjunct member” of the group told reporters with Fader that the band utilized Suno, a generative AI platform, to create their songs, and even said the entire project was an “art hoax.” 

In response, the band posted on their social media that the claims from the adjunct member weren’t true and the identity of the band had been “hijacked.” 

Shortly after, however, the band released a statement confirming that they were created using AI and were “Not quite human. Not quite machine, [but] somewhere in between.”

 Listeners would never be able to tell by simply consuming the music due to the fact that streaming sites like Spotify don’t have any legal obligation to point out AI-generated music. Roberto Neri, the chief executive of the Ivors Academy, one of the largest professional associations for music writers in Europe, spoke to the Guardian about this new issue within the industry. 

“AI-generated bands like Velvet Sundown that are reaching big audiences without involving human creators raise serious concerns around transparency, authorship and consent.”

Neri continued to say that there is room for AI within the music industry, claiming that the technology has the potential to “enhance songwriting,” however, the newness and lack of regulation regarding AI, especially in the multitude of art industries, makes it difficult. 

Embed from Getty Images

Sophie Jones, chief strategy officer at the British Phonographic Industry, echoed the sentiment that artists who use AI should at the very least be open and honest about it. 

“We believe that AI should be used to serve human creativity, not supplant it.”

“That’s why we’re calling on the UK government to protect copyright and introduce new transparency obligations for AI companies so that music rights can be licensed and enforced, as well as calling for the clear labelling of content solely generated by AI.”

Liz Pelly, an expert and author of Mood Machine: The Rise of Spotify and the Costs of the Perfect Playlist, pointed out that the use of AI in the music industry is especially exploitative towards independent artists that people behind AI bands might be using to help train the technology and create tracks. 

“We need to make sure that it’s not just pop stars whose interests are being looked after, all artists should have the ability to know if their work has been exploited in this way,” Pelly said, referring to the recent uptick in AI-generated music in the style of famous performers such as Drake, Ariana Grande, Billie Eilish, The Weeknd, and more. 

Jones added: “The rise of AI-generated bands and music entering the market points to the fact that tech companies have been training AI models using creative works – largely without authorization or payment to creators and rights-holders – in order to directly compete with human artistry.”

Currently, popular streaming platform Spotify doesn’t label music as AI-generated. This has led to criticism regarding the curation of artists, songs, and playlists by “ghost artists.”

A spokesperson for Spotify said: “All music on Spotify, including AI-generated music, is created, owned, and uploaded by licensed third parties.”

kid

YouTube Should Be Included In Australia’s Social Media Ban For Kids Under 16, Commissioner Says 

Australia’s online safety chief has stated that YouTube should be included on the list of social media platforms that are banned for kids under the age of 16. The eSafety commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, is urging the government to include the video-sharing platform to the new regulations which apply to apps like TikTok and Instagram. 

Grant is also recommending that the government update the under-16s social media ban to be more specific, and regulate things like stories, streaks, chatbots, and artificial intelligence which can also pose a major risk to young developing minds. 

Embed from Getty Images

The ban was initially brought to legislation in December 2024, and will come into effect in December 2025. It’s currently unclear how exactly these online platforms will verify users’ ages, and the government has even stated that current confirmation technology is “not guaranteed to be effective.” 

At the time of its initial creation, then communications minister Michelle Rowland alluded that YouTube would be a part of the social media sites included in the ban. The Guardian Australia reported, however, that YouTube’s global chief executive personally lobbied with Rowland to give an exemption to the site which is owned by Google. 

Grant spoke with communications minister Anika Wells, offering advice over including YouTube in the ban and why it’s important:

“Given the known risks of harm on Youtube, the similarity of its functionality to other online services, and without sufficient evidence demonstrating that Youtube predominately provides beneficial experiences for children under 16, providing a specific carve out for Youtube appears to be inconsistent with the purpose of the Act.” 

Rowland said that YouTube was exempt from the ban because the site can be used to give young people access to “education and health support.” Grant said this reasoning is “not consistent with the purpose of the obligation to reduce the risk of harm.”

Embed from Getty Images

Grant is planning to dissect this concern further in her press club speech, and will be referencing a relevant survey involving 2,600 children aged 10 to 15. 

“Alarmingly, around seven in 10 kids said they had encountered harmful content, including exposure to misogynistic or hateful material, dangerous online challenges, violent fight videos, and content promoting disordered eating.”

“Children told us that 75% of this harmful content was most recently encountered on social media. YouTube was the most frequently cited platform in our research, with almost four in 10 children reporting exposure to harmful content there.”

“This also comes as the New York Times reported earlier this month that YouTube surreptitiously rolled back its content moderation processes to keep more harmful content on its platform, even when the content violates the company’s own policies,” Grant will say

“Platform after platform are winding back their trust and safety teams and weakening policies designed to minimise harm, making these platforms ever-more perilous for our children.”