Posts

wildfires

Effects Of Europe And North America Wildfires Could Last For Years

/in , /by

Wildfires across the globe have been rampant this summer, and are being fueled by the impact of climate change. These fires have forced thousands of individuals to flee their homes while they destroy forests, buildings, and dried out land. Experts are now looking at wildfires from years ago to prepare for the lasting effects of the blazes currently occurring throughout Europe and North America. 

This season, about 1,000 fires have been reported in the boreal forests of Canada, leading to a multitude of evacuations in both Canada and US cities as toxic smoke spreads in the air. 

The US is also experiencing a third major heatwave within a month that is causing parched land to dry, creating a perfect environment for wildfires to ignite and spread easily. Washington, eastern Oregon, and Idaho have been experiencing fires that are so intense, plumes of smoke have reached Florida, according to reports. 

Embed from Getty Images

Europe has been experiencing major wildfires all throughout the UK, France, and Spain, causing mass evacuations for over 250,000 people. 

The continuous burning of fossil fuels throughout the past decades have made the climate crisis even worse, creating fire-prone conditions around the world. Pedro Sánchez, Spain’s prime minister, emphasized the severity of these extreme weather events, pointing out how “the entire Iberian peninsula is suffering the effects of the climate emergency in a very specific way.”

Scientists have been consistently raising alarms about the consistent lingering impact of wildfire smoke, which can trigger severe respiratory and cardiac problems. In fact, according to a new study recently published in JACC Journals, it’s been shown that tiny particles carried in wildfire smoke can raise the risk of hospitalization specifically in older people who might even be hundreds of miles away from the actual fires. 

“The cardiovascular toll of wildfire smoke reaches well beyond the fire lines and well beyond the day the sky turns orange,” said Kai Chen, the study’s co-author and associate professor of epidemiology at Yale’s School of Public Health. 

The wildfires that have occurred and increased within the past few years are giving scientists the data they need to better determine long-term impacts on humanity, however, the information is fairly new. One of the biggest resources for this study, and other ongoing ones, has been looking at Maui, which suffered a devastating wildfire three years ago that killed over 100 people and destroyed several thousand buildings. 

The second largest island is still suffering from the aftermath three years later. There has been a major increase in health concerns like poor lung functioning, high blood pressure, and mental health challenges, according to the Maui Wildfire Exposure Study, led by researchers at the University of Hawaii and released on Monday.

Embed from Getty Images

Alika Maunakea, co-director of Maui study and a professor at the school of medicine in the University of Hawaii, said that “the progress is real, and it should be recognized.”

“The biological, emotional, and social consequences of a disaster do not disappear on the same timeline as debris removal or reconstruction.”

The Maui study was conducted utilizing screenings of over 2,500 participants, and it reported that 50% of the adults experienced continuous depressive symptoms with about 20% reported experiencing post-traumatic stress. There was also severe depression and post-traumatic stress symptoms found in children and adolescents, as well as blood pressure readings and obesity levels. 

“Children may appear resilient while still carrying significant emotional and physical effects beneath the surface,” said Christopher Knightsbridge, a mental health therapist based in Lahaina, one of the towns that was widely destroyed by the fires.

“Supporting children means supporting the entire family, including their housing, food security, daily routines and access to trusted care.”

In another research paper published last year, scientists found that there was a 7% increase in mortality among older people in Southern California over a three-year period due to wildfire smoke exposure. Lara Schwarz, an environmental health scientist at UC Berkeley who led the research, recommended that “activation of public health measures such as clean air centers should not only depend on intensity of smoke, as the long-term effects can be harmful, even at low levels.” 

“As wildfires become more frequent and severe in the context of climate change, with California being at high risk, understanding how these harmful wildfires will affect us in the long term is critical to informing better public health action and response.”

social media

U.K. Unveils Overnight Social Media Limits for 16- and 17-Year-Olds

/in /by

A monthlong experiment restricting teenagers’ social media use found that an overnight curfew offered the best balance between improving their well-being and allowing them to stay connected with friends.

More than 300 teenagers and parents from across the U.K. participated in the trial, which tested three different interventions. Some teenagers were limited to 15 minutes of social media use each day, others were blocked from accessing apps between 9 p.m. and 7 a.m., and a third group removed selected platforms entirely.

Participants reported benefits including improved mood, lower stress, greater energy during the day, better sleep and increased concentration. At the same time, the teenagers described a “social and emotional trade-off,” as social media remained an important way to communicate with friends who were not subject to the same restrictions.

The overnight curfew ultimately emerged as the most popular option, with participants viewing it as less socially disruptive than sharply limiting daily use or deleting apps altogether.

The findings are now informing a new set of online safety measures proposed by the U.K. government Wednesday for 16- and 17-year-olds.

Under the proposal, social media accounts belonging to older teenagers would come with an overnight curfew enabled by default beginning at midnight. The restriction would remain in place until 6 a.m., making platforms including Instagram, TikTok and YouTube unavailable through the affected accounts during those hours unless users changed their settings. Features intended to encourage prolonged use, including autoplay and infinite scrolling, would also be automatically disabled.

Teenagers would still be allowed to turn off or adjust those default settings. The measures are expected to come into force by spring 2027.

Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said the changes would be “crucial in helping young people get the sleep they need, focus on school and college, and spend more quality time with family and friends, all of which are fundamental to building a happy, healthy and fulfilling adult life.”

Online Safety Minister Kanishka Narayan similarly defended the proposals, arguing that the curfew and restrictions on autoplay would make Britain “the most robust place in the world when it comes to regulating” technology companies.

The proposal is part of a broader international effort to place tighter limits on children’s access to social media as technology companies face increasing scrutiny over the safety and potentially addictive design of their platforms.

It also joins an increasingly complicated collection of online safety measures already available to families, including optional parental controls on children’s devices and child-focused versions of major services such as YouTube.

“There have been concerns about the way services keep children and young people engaged on their phones for long periods, and that this can impact their sleep, amongst other effects,” Lorna Woods, a professor of internet law at the University of Essex, told the BBC.

Embed from Getty Images

In June, outgoing U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced plans for a more sweeping restriction: a blanket social media ban for children under 16. The ban would cover major services including TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube and X.

The U.K. announcement followed Australia’s move in December to become the first country in the world to enforce a legal social media ban for users under 16.

The government plans to present its latest proposals to Parliament by the end of 2026, to implement them alongside the under-16 ban the following spring.

It also announced plans for additional safeguards governing children’s use of artificial intelligence chatbots, including requirements for providers to introduce regular breaks for users under 18.

European Union officials are also advancing restrictions aimed at younger users. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said Monday that the region would move forward with age limits for social media platforms to reduce use among children and teenagers.

Technology companies, meanwhile, have defended the safeguards already built into their platforms. Ali Law, TikTok’s director of public policy and government affairs in Northern Europe, said during a Tuesday appearance with CNBC that the app was designed with the safety of younger users in mind.

According to Law, TikTok has more than 50 preset protections for users under 16. Those measures include a one-hour daily screen-time limit and a full-screen prompt appearing at 10 p.m. that encourages teenagers to stop using the app and take a break.

“All of these are little default aspects, little nudges to make sure that people have a balanced and healthy relationship with our app, because that works in our interests…because if people are using it for too much and are burnt out, they’re not going to get value from it.”

Other technology companies have argued that responsibility for verifying users’ ages should not rest solely with individual platforms. Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, has previously called for age verification to be handled by device manufacturers.

Apple has since introduced device-level age checks that ask people using iPhones and iPads with the latest operating software to verify their ages.

Baroness Beeban Kidron, a longtime advocate for device-level safety and age-verification measures, criticized the government for focusing too heavily on restricting children’s access rather than changing the products themselves. She said the objective should not be “banning children from tech” but “banning tech from putting toxic products in the hands of children.”

The ability of teenagers to disable the proposed protections has drawn criticism from campaigners, opposition politicians and online safety experts who question whether the default settings will have a meaningful effect.

Embed from Getty Images

Ellen Roome, who believes her 14-year-old son, Jools Sweeney, died in 2022 after participating in a dangerous online challenge, argued that an optional restriction would be too easy for teenagers to circumvent.

“I just think it’s not good enough really just to have a product you can switch off, it’s a bit like offering a 17-year-old a bottle of alcohol and then moving it slightly out of arm’s reach, they can just drag it back in. I really wish they could go stronger and harder on these things.”

Andy Burrows, chief executive of the Molly Rose Foundation, welcomed the attention given to older teenagers but said the announcement remained too narrow.

“While we welcome these measures for older teens, this latest move is yet another piecemeal set of announcements, not the comprehensive plan for children’s safety that’s required,” Burrows said.

Some experts have also warned that a blanket nighttime restriction could unintentionally cut vulnerable teenagers off from support. Sonia Livingstone, a professor specializing in children’s digital rights at the London School of Economics, said a distinction should be made between curbing disruptive platform features and completely blocking access.

“If it’s a curfew on companies using push notifications to wake someone up in the night, absolutely have a curfew,” Livingstone told the BBC.

“But if it’s a curfew that prevents a child in need of support or help or comfort reaching out to trusted sources in the middle of the night, I think that’s quite harmful potentially.”

Dame Rachel de Souza, the children’s commissioner for England, said young people generally oppose outright bans but support protections from features that encourage compulsive use.

“We have to listen to young people. They don’t want a ban, but they do want to be protected from addictive, infinite scrolling,” she said.

De Souza added that she wanted more details on how the curfew would be enforced and said she would press the communications regulator, Ofcom, to fully exercise its authority over online safety.

Social media analyst Matt Navarra dismissed the proposal as “not a curfew,” but a “mildly annoying settings prompt with a government press release attached.”

“The UK Government is calling this ‘world-leading’ online safety, but with no VPN restrictions, it’s leaving the side door open and putting up a sign asking teens not to use it,” Navarra said.

The government does not currently plan to restrict virtual private networks, which can disguise a user’s location and have previously been used to evade online controls, including Australia’s social media restrictions. Officials said VPNs remain important to whistleblowers, minority communities and families seeking privacy.

Government-commissioned research also found little evidence that large numbers of children were using VPNs to bypass age-verification systems.

“We have decided not to limit VPNs today, and that’s the primary conclusion for now, but it is something we will continue to review,” Narayan said.

social media ban

UK To Ban Kids From Social Media, Ministers Lobby With US To Avoid Backlash 

/in , /by

The UK has announced that they will be banning social media for kids under the age of 16. Some of the world’s biggest technology companies, including Meta, YouTube, and Snapchat, have spoken out against this decision, claiming that it will only work to push teenagers to more harmful platforms. The ban was announced by Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday. 

A spokesperson for Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, said: “As we’ve seen in Australia, bans risk isolating teens from online communities and information, and driving them to unregulated alternatives that lack built-in protections and parental controls.”

YouTube echoed Meta’s sentiment in their own statement: “Blanket bans push kids out of such curated, supervised, beneficial experiences and towards anonymous, less-safe services.”

And Snapchat said: “Because the majority of time spent on Snapchat is in private messaging between friends and family, an outright ban that disconnects teens from those relationships doesn’t make them safer – it may simply push them to less safe platforms.”

Embed from Getty Images

During Starmer’s announcement at a press conference this week, he said that “social media makes children unhappy, it’s making it easier for billies to harass and abuse them, and it could even be harming their mental health.” He then emphasized the argument that the ban was not anti-tech. 

“I do not accept, and I will never accept, that you can’t be both pro tech and AI, and at the same time say we must protect our children,” he said. 

The plan mimics the one enacted earlier this year in Australia, however, it includes both a ban on all main social media platforms, and separate restrictions on online services such as gaming apps such as removing the option to chat with strangers. 

Under this new ban, kids under the age of 16 will not be able to download Snapchat, YouTube, TikTok, X, Facebook, and Instagram. They also will not be able to livestream. Teenagers under the age of 18 will also not be able to use any romantic chatbots designed to simulate sexual relationships. 

“This is not something I do lightly, and I will not present it as cost-free, as if social media has [brought no] benefits to young people, because clearly that is wrong. But the government is always about choices, and it’s clear to me that a total ban is the right choice,” Starmer said.

In Australia, many teenagers have found ways around the bans, which has even led to lawsuits against certain social media platforms for not doing enough to enforce keeping young teens and children off their apps. While this can obviously happen in the UK as well and it is a concern, Starmer stated that it wasn’t the point behind this objective. 

“We don’t say: ‘Oh, look, a teenager managed to get a drink somehow, so let’s not bother banning alcohol sales for children.’ We don’t do that, do we? I just don’t accept that,” he said. 

“Our laws are rules, but they’re also an expression of our values. They shape the social contract, and so this will change the conversations that parents have, and the expectations of children over time.”

“It will make a huge difference. It will make our children safer. It will make our children happier. It will give them more time, more security, full freedom to grow up, more opportunity, and that, at the end of the day, is what this government is about,” he added. 

The other side to this is combating the giant companies that are widely against these bans, which is intertwined with talking to the US government and president and reassuring them that this isn’t a targeted ploy towards US tech companies. 

Embed from Getty Images

UK ministers have been working on a lobbying operation to prevent backlash from the Trump administration. The administration had previously threatened the UK with “a big tariff” if the government does not drop its digital services tax, so they’re moving extra cautiously when it comes to this ban. 

“I honestly think that across world leaders there has always been a recognition that leaders have to take steps to protect children,” Starmer said. “In relation to President Trump, I spoke to him on Saturday, I’ll see him again this afternoon and, yes, of course, we’ll discuss this and many other issues, and lots of other leaders are very interested in it.”

Elon Musk, who owns X and has worked closely with the president, said “this censorship law is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. The real goal is to enable the UK government to track everyone.” 

Ministers are working on every detail of this ban and what it will entail. They’ve announced late-night social media curfews for 16-and-17-year-olds. One of the workarounds that teenagers have used in Australia is using virtual private networks (VPNs) to circumvent geographical internet controls, so the UK is looking into regulating those networks as well. 

This move will have a major impact on young people. In the UK, among 13-to-15-year-olds about 90% have a social media account, and have stated that their main resource for getting the news is YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, and Instagram, according to reports from the Guardian. 

The UK’s technology secretary, Liz Kendall, echoed Starmer’s sentiment regarding the importance of protecting children and their mental health and not having such a focus on how teens can work around the bans. 

“I have no doubt children who are currently on social media, for whom it’s an integral part of their lives, will try and get around the ban, and many will succeed,” she said. 

“But we do think we need to draw this line in the sand, give greater clarity to parents and greater protections for children.”

“I’ve never thought that the ban will be a complete silver bullet … It will be as much about resetting expectations and social norms for children who are seven, eight, nine, 10, now that they won’t be going on social media until they’re 16,” she told the BBC.

“This is a huge statement of our values, who we are as a country, and it’s a way of actually bringing our country together,” Starmer said.

sxsw

US Political Commentator And Twitch Streamer, Hasan Piker, Denied Entry To UK 

/in , , /by

Hasan Piker, a liberal political commentator and Twitch streamer with over 2.8 million followers, was due to speak with fellow online commentator Cenk Uygur at the SXSW London festival and an event in Oxford. However, both creators have now been blocked from entering the United Kingdom with the Home Office revoking their visas.

Read more
heat

Extreme Heatwave In Europe Is ‘A Brutal Reminder’ Of Climate Crisis, UN Chief States 

/in , /by

The United Nations climate chief recently stated that the extreme early heat events taking over parts of western Europe have become a “brutal reminder of the spiraling impacts of the climate crisis.” This month, both France and the United Kingdom set new temperature records on two consecutive days. 

Simon Stiell is the executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, and this week he said that the “main culprit” of the climate crisis is humanity’s burning of oil, coal, and gas. 

Embed from Getty Images

“The science is clear that human-induced climate change is making these heatwaves more frequent and extreme.”

France, Spain, and the UK have been reaching temperatures that are, on average, only seen in July and/or August.  

“Protecting human lives, businesses and economies from extreme heat and the many other soaring costs of climate change is core business for every nation, and it starts with kicking the fossil fuel addiction much faster.”

Other reports have shown that the war in the Middle East has greatly impacted the “soaring costs” of fossil fuels, and led to a need to move to cleaner sources of energy. Stiell also pointed out that India has experienced nearly 110 degrees Fahrenheit conditions which have led to deaths from heatstroke. 

The UK’s Met Office stated that Kew Gardens in London recorded a temperature of 92.2 degrees Fahrenheit, breaking the record for highest temperature in May, which was set the day before. The readings also surpassed a previous record of 91.04 degrees Fahrenheit which was set in 1922, and again in 1944. 

France experienced local highs of 102.2 degrees Fahrenheit on Wednesday, and recorded their hottest day in May ever on Tuesday when the national heat index, an average of 30 readings around the nation, hit 76.64 degrees Fahrenheit, according to reports from the Guardian. 

Météo-France, the national weather service, stated that a “heat dome,” which causes heat to be held in place by a high-pressure weather front, was producing temperatures up to 55.4 degrees higher than what is usual for this time of year. 

17 out of 96 of France’s administrative departments, including Paris, were placed on an orange high temperature alert for Thursday, the second highest level. This alert level requires the nation’s population to be “very vigilant and take precautions.” Another 29 were placed on the more moderate yellow warning. 

Embed from Getty Images

Scientists have stated that as the world continues to warm, extreme heat events that are typically exclusive to the peak of summer are becoming both more frequent and intense, and are happening earlier and later into the year. 

Peter Thorne, the director of climate research at Maynooth University in Ireland, said: “We know beyond a shadow of a doubt that events such as this have been made more likely and more severe due to climate change arising from our emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases.”

“Nevertheless, many of the records being set, particularly in the UK and France, are mind-bogglingly crazy.”

This week, French authorities reported at least seven deaths that were directly and indirectly connected to the high temperatures. Five of these deaths were drownings, as many people were seeking out swimming spots to cool off. Authorities in Britain stated that four teenagers have also drowned in England since Sunday. 

Spain is reporting temperatures could hit 104 degrees Fahrenheit this week. These reports led to the Basque Country being placed on an orange weather alert.

Aemet, Spain’s state meteorological office, said that temperatures typically experienced in July have already been recorded across the country. Rubén del Campo, a spokesperson for Aemet, said that the heat was “more characteristic of the dog days, the hottest period of the year.”

“Both this episode and the atmospheric pattern that’s causing it are part and parcel of climate change and of what’s been observed in recent years.” 

no smoking

Britain Passes Landmark Bill to Phase Out Cigarette Sales for Future Generations

/in /by

Britain is moving toward a future in which today’s children may never legally purchase cigarettes, after lawmakers backed sweeping new anti-smoking measures that combine a phased tobacco ban with tighter oversight of vaping products. The legislation, approved by Parliament on Tuesday, is expected to become law following the formal step of royal assent by King Charles III.

At the center of the legislation is a generational policy shift. The legal age for buying tobacco will increase by one year, every year, starting with anyone born on or after January 1, 2009. Over time, that rolling threshold effectively creates a permanent prohibition for those age groups, meaning they will never reach a legal age to buy cigarettes.

In practice, the policy targets anyone currently 17 or younger and applies across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, with the aim of ensuring they never take up smoking at any point in their lives.

The measures are part of the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, which is expected to receive royal assent next week, formalizing one of the most ambitious public health efforts in the country’s history.

First proposed in 2024, the bill places Britain among a small group of countries experimenting with so-called “generational” smoking bans, following similar efforts in places like New Zealand and the Maldives, though such policies have faced political pushback and reversals elsewhere.

Embed from Getty Images

Officials argue the long-term payoff could be substantial. Smoking remains one of the leading causes of preventable death in England, linked to roughly 64,000 deaths and 400,000 hospital admissions each year. The financial burden is also significant, costing the National Health Service about 3 billion pounds annually.

Across the wider economy, smoking is estimated to cost tens of billions of pounds each year and is linked to deepening inequality, with government data suggesting around 500,000 households are pushed into poverty in part due to tobacco spending.

Health Secretary Wes Streeting framed the legislation as a turning point.

“Children in the UK will be part of the first smoke-free generation, protected from a lifetime of addiction and harm. Prevention is better than cure – this reform will save lives, ease pressure on the NHS, and build a healthier Britain.”

Alongside the phased tobacco ban, the bill also expands restrictions on vaping and nicotine products, reflecting growing concern about their popularity among young people. The legislation reinforces existing rules by prohibiting sales of vaping products to those under 18 and introducing stricter limits on advertising, retail displays, giveaways, and price promotions.

Embed from Getty Images

These steps build on earlier action taken last year, when the government banned single-use or disposable vapes amid rising worries about youth uptake and environmental waste. Under the new framework, ministers will also gain authority to regulate product details such as flavors and packaging through secondary legislation intended to curb the appeal of nicotine products to younger consumers.

Officials have described tobacco as one of the “main underlying drivers of ill-health,” underscoring the broader goal of reducing long-term strain on the country’s publicly funded healthcare system.

Vaping, once promoted as a harm-reduction alternative to smoking, has become a more complicated policy issue. According to the health charity Action on Smoking and Health, about 10% of adults in Great Britain, roughly 5.5 million people, currently use e-cigarettes. This figure has remained largely steady since 2024, suggesting growth may be leveling off.

Usage patterns further complicate the picture. About half of adult vapers are former smokers, while around 40% continue to smoke alongside vaping, indicating that dual use remains common.

At the same time, surveys suggest many smokers are ambivalent about their habit, with roughly three-quarters saying they wish they had never started and a majority expressing a desire to quit—findings cited by health officials to support the argument that “addiction is not a choice.”

Taken together, the bill’s architects say the combined approach of phasing out tobacco access for future generations while tightening control over vaping aims to reduce nicotine addiction at its source and lessen long-term strain on the healthcare system.

eta

Americans Officially Need An ETA, In Addition To A Passport, To Visit The United Kingdom 

/in , /by

In order for Americans to now travel to the United Kingdom, they will need more than just a passport. As of the end of February, the British government started requiring an electronic travel authorization (ETA) or visa for foreign tourists to enter the UK. 

Embed from Getty Images

Starting on April 23rd, an ETA will also be required to visit the Channel islands of Jersey and Guernsey off the coast of France, and the Isle of Man in the Irish Sea, according to USA Today. 

“Visitors without an ETA will not be able to board their transport and cannot travel to the UK, unless exempt,” the UK’s interior department posted on its official blog.

“You usually need an ETA rather than a visa if you’re from Europe, the USA, Australia, Canada or certain other countries,” according to the British government.

The ETA can be used for up to six months of visa-free tourism, family visits, and other select activities outlined by the UK government. Each traveler will need their own ETA including babies. 

For foreign tourists hoping to travel to the UK, the fastest way to get an ETA is through the official UK ETA app, however, applications can also be filled out and submitted through the Home Office’s website for anyone who may not have access to the application. 

Applicants using either the app or website will need to upload a photo of their passport and a photo of themselves. They will also need to answer a series of questions and pay an application fee. Applicants who are 10-years-old or over will also need to scan their face. 

Embed from Getty Images

An ETA will cost 20 pounds through the UK ETA app or gov.uk. That’s about $28, according to Western Union’s exchange rates as of this month. 

The British government has also pointed out third-party sites could charge more for applications and also is warning travelers to “avoid websites that imitate government services.” 

The Home Office, UK’s interior department, stated that most applicants will get an automatic decision within minutes of applying through the app. However, if an application is rejected, applicants will be given a direct reason and will also be able to reapply. 

If an application is refused, “they cannot appeal and instead need to apply for a visa if they still wish to seek permission to come to the UK.” 

The government also said that individuals with criminal records may want to apply for a Standard Visitor visa.

ETA’s are valid for two years or until the individual’s passport expires, whichever one comes first. An ETA can be used for multiple visits during that two year period, but the trips must be less than six months. 

British and Irish citizens do not need an ETA. Travelers with a UK visa, permission to live, work, or study in the UK, a British overseas territory citizens passport, or a British national passport will also not need an ETA. 

grok

Media Regulator Opens Formal Investigation Into X For Oversexualized AI Image Generation 

/in , /by

The investigation specifically regards the site’s Grok AI tool which is now being used to manipulate preexisting images of women and children to remove their clothes and create inappropriately oversexualized AI images. 

Read more
ai music

Paul McCartney Joins Artists Protesting AI By Releasing Songs That Are Completely Silent 

/in , /by

Paul McCartney has released his first recording in five years. This single, however, is a part of a larger protest from UK artists fighting against the use of artificial intelligence in the music industry and using real artists’ voices and likeness to train the bots. 

The former Beatle will be releasing a track of almost complete silence to protest copyright theft. Instead of melodies and lyrics, there is only the sounds of a quiet hiss and odd clatter, according to reports. 

Embed from Getty Images

The track is suggesting that if AI companies are going to exploit the intellectual property of musicians in order to train their generative AI models, the entire creative entity of the music industry becomes essentially useless with original artists losing opportunities and thus, being silenced. 

McCartney is currently touring in North America, and has added the new silent track to the B-side of an LP called ‘Is This What We Want?’

The LP is filled with other silent recordings and will be pressed on vinyl and released later this month. 

This LP project is McCartney’s contribution to an overall campaign from musicians and artists in the UK urging their government to pass regulations that will stop technology companies from training their AI models without approvals or paying royalties to the artists. 

McCartney’s album track listing spells out: “The British government must not legalize music theft to benefit AI companies.”

Ed Newton-Rex, composer and campaigner for copyright fairness, vocalized his support for the protest album as well. 

“I am very concerned the government is paying more attention to US tech companies’ interests rather than British creatives’ interests.”

Sam Fender, Kate Bush, Hans Zimmer, and the Pet Shop Boys are among the other artists that are supporting the campaign. 

Embed from Getty Images

The newest track from McCartney is entitled (bonus track) and begins with 55 seconds of tape hiss before 15 seconds of indeterminate clattering that teases the possibility of a build up to something, but instead settles into another 80 seconds of “rustle-punctuated hiss and concluding with a slow and poignant fadeout,” the Guardian reports.  

McCartney has been a vocal advocate leading the musicians and artists of Britain in protesting this AI use. 

“We[’ve] got to be careful about it (AI) because it could just take over and we don’t want that to happen, particularly for the young composers and writers [for] who, it may be the only way they[’re] gonna make a career,” McCartney said. 

“If AI wipes that out, that would be a very sad thing indeed.”

Kate Bush is another notable advocate for the regulation of AI training and copyright frustrations, who’s also been involved in the protest album. “In the music of the future, will our voices go unheard?” 

Composer Max Richter said: “The government’s proposals would impoverish creators, favouring those automating creativity over the people who compose our music, write our literature, paint our art.”

A government spokesperson stated that it’s putting the interests of UK citizens and businesses first when responding to McCartney’s advocacy and protest project. 

Responding to McCartney’s intervention, a government spokesperson said it put the interests of the UK’s citizens and businesses first.

“We’ve always been clear on the need to work with both the creative industries and AI sector to drive AI innovation and ensure robust protections for creators,” the spokesperson said.

“We are bringing together both British and global companies, alongside voices beyond the AI and creative sectors, to ensure we can capture the broadest possible range of expert views as we consider next steps.”

instagram

Facebook And Instagram Will Charge UK Users For Ad-Free Versions Of The Platforms 

/in , /by

Meta has announced that Facebook and Instagram users in the United Kingdom will now be offered ad-free versions of the platforms if they pay a monthly fee up to £3.99 ($5.37) a month.

This announcement comes from Mark Zuckerberg as a response to regulatory warnings about personalized advertisements which are generated by using users’ data placed in an algorithm to produce targeted ads. The ad-free subscription service gives users the option to get out of targeted ads. 

Embed from Getty Images

Reports indicate that web users will be charged £2.99 ($4.02) a month and mobile users will be charged £3.99 ($5.37) a month to scroll through Facebook and Instagram without seeing advertisements. 

Additionally, if accounts are linked, users will only need to pay one monthly fee. In a statement, Meta stated: 

“This will give people based in the UK the choice between continuing to use Facebook and Instagram for free with personalized ads, or subscribing to stop seeing ads.”

Users who opt not to pay the monthly fee will continue to see advertisements on their pages as usual. In their statement, Meta said the paid tier services will be rolled out throughout the upcoming weeks. 

This new subscription model is very similar to one that already exists between Meta and the European Union. However, the EU deemed that policy in breach of the digital markets act by the European Commission. The digital markets act is a piece of legislation that was designed to crack down on the overwhelming power big tech holds. 

The commission fined Meta €200 million ($235,125,380) this year after claims that the company could, and should, have released a free version of their sites that utilized less personal data including the users gender, age, and location, to be used to make targeted ads. 

Embed from Getty Images

The Informational Commissioner’s Office is the UK’s data watchdog, and they stated that they support the move from Meta. 

“This moves Meta away from targeting users with ads as part of the standard terms and conditions for using its Facebook and Instagram services, which we’ve been clear is not in line with UK law,” said an ICO spokesperson according to the Guardian. 

The ICO stated this year that internet and Meta users should have the option to “opt out” of their personal data being used to create and push targeted ads. This statement came after Meta settled a court case with a UK citizen regarding targeted advertisements. 

More specifically, Meta agreed in the court case to stop targeting Tanya O’Carroll, a human rights campaigner who alleged that the company breached UK data laws by neglecting to respect her right to demand that Facebook stop collecting her data for the sake of personalized ads. 

After the lawsuit and settlement, Meta announced it was considering creating and implementing an ad-free subscription service to its social networks. 

Gareth Oldale, a partner at UK law firm TLT, stated that the ICO’s support for the new subscription service from Meta exemplifies a divergence between the EU and UK. 

“This position is certainly pro-business and illustrative of the UK government’s direction to regulators to support economic growth and development of the digital economy,” he said. “It does, however, mean that the divergence between the UK and the EU positions has grown a little wider.”