Posts

running

Even Very Slow Running Can Benefit The Brain, Study Suggests

A 10-minute jog at a pace barely faster than walking may still be enough to give the brain a short-term boost, according to new research examining how very slow running affects mood and cognitive function.

Researchers at the University of Tsukuba in Japan found that even running at extremely low speeds was associated with improved mood, faster performance on a test of attention and self-control, and increased activity in parts of the brain’s prefrontal cortex. The findings were published in Imaging Neuroscience.

The researchers recruited 24 healthy young adults and had each participant spend 10 minutes running on a treadmill at a slow pace of roughly 1.9 to 3.7 miles per hour (3 to 6 kilometers per hour).

During the treadmill sessions, average heart rates among both male and female participants ranged from 104 to 107 beats per minute. The researchers compared those sessions with separate days when participants spent 10 minutes sitting still.

Following the slow-running sessions, participants reported significant improvements in mood, including feeling more alert and more pleasant than they did after sitting.

They also performed better on a cognitive test measuring attention and self-control, responding more quickly after running than after sitting still.

During the tests, participants wore headsets that monitored changes in oxygenated hemoglobin near the surface of the brain.

Although the technique is less precise than an MRI, it can provide a general indication of which areas of the brain become more active during certain tasks.

After participants ran, the headsets detected a stronger oxygen-rich blood signal in two areas of the left prefrontal cortex while they completed the cognitive tests. The region plays an important role in both cognition and mood.

Some of the same researchers had previously found that 10 minutes of moderate-intensity running could increase activation in the prefrontal cortex. The new experiment suggests that those effects may also appear at much lower running intensities.

Embed from Getty Images

There are several limitations to the findings. The study involved only 24 healthy young adults, so the results may not apply to people of different ages or health backgrounds.

It also examined only the immediate effects of a single 10-minute session, rather than the long-term effects of regularly running at a slow pace.

And because the researchers compared running with sitting rather than walking, the experiment cannot determine whether very slow running produces benefits that similarly gentle walking would not.

What causes the observed changes remains uncertain. One possibility is that running activates neural networks that project into the prefrontal cortex. Another involves the rhythmic movement of the head during a run.

Animal experiments have suggested that repeated up-and-down head movement may mechanically stimulate the brain, raising the possibility that head acceleration itself could contribute to some of the effects.

“This is a new and challenging hypothesis, and the exact neural circuitry involved in the positive effect of head acceleration on mood has not been identified and needs further investigation.”

The researchers found that, among participants in the study, greater head acceleration during very slow running was associated with higher levels of exercise-induced pleasure. Head acceleration accounted for about 17 percent of the variation in improved mood scores between participants.

“This discovery of the positive relationship between head acceleration and improved mood may be one of the underlying mechanisms through which very slow running promotes mental health.”

Previous studies examining low-intensity exercise and cognition have often focused on cycling, in part because researchers can more easily control the exercise intensity.

Embed from Getty Images

But cycling may not produce the same degree of rhythmic head movement as jogging, which could matter if head acceleration contributes to the effects observed in the new study.

The findings also raise a broader question about running’s role in human evolution.

Humans evolved to run long distances while upright on two legs, and endurance rather than speed may have helped early humans survive by allowing them to pursue large prey across the savannah.

The researchers suggest that the evolutionary importance of running could also be connected to the development of the human brain.

“It is interesting to hypothesize that human upright bipedal running is also strongly tied to the evolutionary expansion of the Homo sapiens’ frontal lobes and higher cognitive functions. Against this background, running may be viewed not simply as another exercise modality, but as a biologically foundational form of human movement with particular relevance to brain function.”

That evolutionary connection remains speculative, and the current experiment cannot establish that running played a role in the development of human cognition. Nor can the study determine the exact mechanism responsible for the changes researchers observed after exercise.

But the findings suggest that a run does not necessarily have to be fast or demanding to produce measurable short-term changes in mood, cognitive performance, and brain activity.

So on days when a run feels more like an awkward shuffle than a workout, it may still be doing something useful.

us aid

US Withdrawal From Foreign Aid Programs Leave Africa’s Healthcare Systems ‘Under Growing Strain’

The United States has withdrawn from key aid programs in Africa and has put their healthcare systems “under growing strain,” according to a new report. 

The report stated that the Trump Administration’s cuts to programs like the US Agency for International Development (USAID) along with the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and rising cost of living has brought on a “new urgency” for the need to reform healthcare in the global south. 

The report was titled ‘A Sovereign Future For Health’ and was created by global health initiative Accra Reset and led by John Dramani Mahama, president of Ghana. Accra Reset believes that nations in Africa and the wider global south should have more control over their health development as opposed to being dependent on aid from western nations and international institutions. 

Mahama and Accra Reset said that Africa statistically produces less than 1% of its vaccines while carrying about a quarter of the global disease burden. 

Embed from Getty Images

The report also said how abrupt changes to global health financing like the US withdrawal from several global health initiatives, has forced countries within the global south to urgently restrict their finances. 

The Trump administration’s decision to dissolve USAID also pushed Nigeria to absorb the 28,000 health workers who were previously employed by the agency. 

The withdrawal of the US Emergency Plan for Aids Relief funding in South Africa has led to many HIV clinics closing throughout the country. Previously, the funding provided more than $400 million annually, and is credited for saving 26 million lives around the world within the past 23 years. 

These cuts to funding have caused “severe and devastating disruption globally,” according to research that was presented at the 26th International Aids Conference in Brazil this year. 

Mahama attended the World Health Assembly in May, where he stated that Ghana alone lost $78 million after the closure of USAID programs, greatly impacting the treatment of malaria, maternal healthcare, nutrition, and HIV/Aids intervention. 

“The Accra Reset is not an argument for traditional donors to do less on global health. It is an argument for doing it differently and doing it better. As countries take greater ownership of their health futures, donor countries should step up to support that transition – following the lead of countries that set their own priorities, and work alongside them to determine where outside support is most valuable,” said Naveen Rao, senior vice-president of the health initiative at the Rockefeller Foundation. 

Embed from Getty Images

“The Accra Reset shows how we can evolve to back country-led solutions while advancing our shared health and economic interests.”

Mahama stated in the report that the “past few years have shaken global health cooperation to its foundations.”

“The Covid-19 pandemic exposed the risks created by concentrated production and unequal access to essential health products; rising debt and fiscal pressures have constrained national health budgets; and declining development assistance is placing programs and services under growing strain.”

“These shocks have brought new urgency to reform debates that have continued for years with limited progress. It was in this context that we launched the Accra Reset and its Sovereign Health Agenda – to give renewed political force to the reform agenda and place the agency of countries of the Global South at its center.”

The report also noted a recent survey in which many US citizens stated that we should continue to be investing in, and providing, foreign aid. 

The survey polled more than 2,000 US adults and was commissioned by the Rockefeller Foundation. The results showed that about 75% of Americans, including the 52% who support Donald Trump, believe that the US should restore disease prevention aid, specifically to help contain the Ebola virus. 

It also found that 65% of American adults support international cooperation even if it means compromising national interests.

FDA

FDA Approves Groundbreaking Drug For Advanced Pancreatic Cancer 

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved of a new groundbreaking drug this week for people going through advanced pancreatic cancer. The goal is to offer US patients more effective treatments and improved survival rates. 

The first-of-its-kind pill is called daraxonrasib, which works by blocking mutated proteins that fuel tumor growth in more than 90% of pancreatic cancer cases, according to reports. 

Revolution Medicines will be selling the daily pills under the brand name Rasonque. The company announced that a one-month supply will cost around $39,800. 

Embed from Getty Images

In the medicines study, researchers randomly assigned the pill for patients to either receive the experimental treatment, or go through additional chemotherapy. Patients who took the drug were found to nearly double their survival time. The 500 patients that participated all had cancer that was metastatic, spreading, and had quit responding to prior treatments. 

The patients who received the new treatment lived for an average of 13.2 months, compared with 6.7 months for chemotherapy recipients. Side effects reported included skin rash, mouth sores, diarrhea, and other digestive issues. 

Dr. Andrew Coveler of the Fred Hutch Cancer Center stated: 

“This is one of the most anticipated approvals I can think of. This medicine is not a cure but a significant improvement.”

Pancreatic cancer is known as one of the most deadly forms of cancer, mainly due to the fact that it’s difficult to detect in its earlier stages, so it gets the chance to grow and spread to other organs in the body. 

The American Cancer Society estimates that around 67,000 new cases will be diagnosed in the US this year, with more than 52,000 dying from the disease. The five-year overall survival rate is also reported to be about 13%. 

Embed from Getty Images

Former Senator Ben Sasse was one of the recipients of the drug this year, and told CBS’ “60 Minutes” that he was experiencing less pain, causing the pill to receive national attention, and motivating the FDA to speed-up their approval. 

The FDA was then granted “expanded access” before the drug is officially approved, so it can be given to patients who meet certain criteria. 

FDA regulators this week also said that they approved the drug more than six months ahead of their target date. 

“It is our fundamental duty to deliver more cures and meaningful treatments to patients as quickly as possible,” FDA’s acting commissioner, Kyle Diamantas, said in a statement. 

Doctors who specialize in treating pancreatic cancer are also hopeful that the makeup of this drug can ideally be used to create new treatment options for other types of cancers as well, especially with so many experimental treatments currently in the works. 

“I think this has opened doors for many other companies,” said Dr. Pashtoon Kasi of City of Hope Orange County, a California-based cancer center. 

“Downstream I think there are going to be a lot more trials looking at this approach in other tumor types.”

Dr. Antony Arumairaj

Medicine as a Lifelong Journey of Learning and Care | Dr. Antony Arumairaj

For Dr. Antony Jackson Arumairaj, medicine has always been as much about asking questions as finding answers. Across decades of training, clinical practice, research, and teaching, that curiosity has remained central to how he approaches both patients and the profession itself.

hrt

Women Taking HRT For Menopause Have A Lower Risk Of Dementia, New Study Suggests 

According to a new study, women who use hormone replacement therapy (HRT) may have a reduced risk of dementia. 

The study itself took place in the United Kingdom and was the largest of its kind, tracking over 180,000 post menopausal women. The scientists found that the participants who used HRT were 10% less likely to develop any kind of dementia and 16% less likely to be diagnosed with Alzheimer’s, compared to those who never used it, according to reports. 

Embed from Getty Images

The study and its findings were published in the journal Alzheimer’s & Dementia, and was led by Professor Anne-Marie Minihane, who is also the director of the Norwich Institute for Healthy Aging at the University of East Anglia. 

Minihane revealed that they saw the greatest risk reduction in women using HRT who also underwent surgical menopause, finding a 26% lower risk of developing any type of dementia compared to women who didn’t use the therapy. 

“While HRT has long been prescribed primarily to relieve menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes and night sweats, this work suggests it may also play a role in long-term cognitive health for some women.”

Women are more likely to develop dementia due to the fact that, statistically, they live longer than men. Scientists also think it could be related to the impact of menopause on their brain metabolism and the impact of the main risk gene for Alzheimer’s being greater on women. 

“We wanted to better understand how HRT could prevent dementia and to assess if particular groups of women may respond differently,” Minihane said. 

The study used data from the UK Biobank, allowing them to track 183,450 postmenopausal women over about 13 years. Throughout that timespan almost 4,000 cases of dementia were identified, and the scientists looked at whether or not using HRT of any kind for at least one year changed women’s risk of developing dementia. 

Embed from Getty Images

The study also pointed out that women who naturally had lower oestrogen exposure throughout their life, either due to starting their periods late or going through early menopause, would benefit more from HRT, with a 16% lower risk of any kind of dementia. 

Of course, genetics also play a role. Women who carried the Apoe4 gene had a stronger association with HRT use and dementia. 

“This is really important because Apoe4 carriers are typically considered at higher risk and have fewer established prevention options,” said Minihane.

The results of this study are based on observational data rather than a randomized-controlled trial, so there’s no way to prove a causal link.

Dr Susan Kohlhaas, the executive director of research and partnerships at Alzheimer’s Research UK, said: 

“This study alone isn’t enough to tell us whether HRT should be used to reduce dementia risk, but it provides further evidence that the timing of HRT and a woman’s hormonal history may matter.

“We now need research that can establish whether HRT itself is responsible for these differences in dementia risk and understand which forms of HRT may have an effect.

“Anyone considering starting or stopping HRT should speak to their GP about the potential benefits and risks for them.”

covid

US Experiencing Covid-19 Surge In Every State 

Every state in the US is currently experiencing a rise in Covid-19 cases, with healthcare professionals and experts warning citizens to be on the lookout for symptoms, and stay diligent with healthy lifestyle practices. 

Dr. John Brooks, an infectious disease doctor at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia who also used to work at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, told NPR about how as a country, “we’re now in the midst of a growing summer surge of Covid.” 

“I think most of us kind of feel like it’s fading away and are certainly very grateful for that. But nationally we’re seeing [Covid-19] ticking up pretty much everywhere.”

Embed from Getty Images

According to the CDC, the disease is mainly spreading in the South and West, but is also rising in the Northeast and Midwest. As of right now, however, the virus is still at very low levels, and the current wave of infections is following along the trend of getting milder each year, with less people being hospitalized or dying. 

“What we’re seeing is very likely evidence of growing herd immunity if you will,” Dr. Brooks said. 

“More and more people have had one or more infections that give them some immunity against the virus and have had more than one vaccination, or maybe both, and all of that really has begun to offer us a lot of protection.”

The most important thing that doctors want US residents to remember is Covid-19 never disappeared, and is still greatly impacting communities around the nation. Many are still finding themselves feeling intensely sick for up to two weeks, and for some people, Covid can still cause serious disease, hospitalizations, and in the worst of cases, death. 

Caitlin Rivers, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, MD, emphasized this point to NPR, stating that “Covid-19 is still dangerous, particularly for older adults, infants, and people who are immunocompromised.” 

“In a typical office if you have 20 colleagues, it’s likely that one or two of them are some degree of immunocompromised. So it’s very common that people have risk factors that make Covid-19 dangerous.”

Rivers also pointed out that unlike flu season, which sees a major surge in the winter months, Covid-19 has seen spikes twice a year since the initial pandemic in 2020. That biannual surge remains a mystery to experts. 

“It’s a big mystery as far as I’m concerned. It is the only seasonal respiratory virus that has a summer season. To my knowledge, we don’t know what is causing this seasonality.”

Embed from Getty Images

Rivers advises the general public to stay up to date on their vaccines, and pointed out how she still wears a mask when she’s in crowded places. Staying consistent with your vaccines also allows the body to stay strong against the new and dominant strains that emerge. 

The CDC has not issued any updated recommendations for Covid-19 vaccinations due to litigation over the Trump administration’s work to overhaul immunizations in the US, according to reports. 

The administration itself no longer recommends that everyone aged 6 months and older routinely get an annual shot. Major medical groups, however, still highly recommend it. 

Major insurance companies throughout the nation have also emphasized that they will continue to cover the costs of vaccinations, and the shots themselves will also still be free through other government programs. 

Public health experts are worried about the opposing messages regarding vaccines and how they might confuse more vulnerable populations as well. 

Claire Hannan, for example, is an executive director of the Association of Immunization Managers which works to advocate for immunization and the multiple free programs that offer them throughout the US. 

“The message is that the Covid-19 vaccine and the flu vaccine will be available, they’re covered by insurers, they’re recommended by medical societies. People should get them and get them for their kids.”

Dr. Brooks also pointed out that there’s also now a new drug called Xocova that individuals can take right after they’ve been exposed to the virus to decrease their chances of getting sick from Covid-19. This will especially be useful for individuals working in the healthcare industry who are exposed to a myriad of sick patients every day. 

“It is something for people to just have in the back of their mind.”

stairs

Taking the Stairs May Lower Your Risk of Heart Disease and Early Death

Choosing the stairs instead of the elevator may be one of the simplest ways to work more heart-healthy movement into your day, according to new research from the University of East Anglia and the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital.

EPA

5 Dead in Louisiana After Contracting Flesh-Eating Vibrio Bacteria

Five people in Louisiana have died this year after contracting Vibrio vulnificus, a potentially deadly bacterium found naturally in warm coastal and brackish waters, state health officials said.

Louisiana has reported nine cases of Vibrio vulnificus so far this year, with another four people hospitalized. Every case involved a wound that had been exposed to seawater, according to health officials, and all nine patients had underlying health conditions that can raise the risk of serious illness and complications.

Health officials are urging people with open wounds to avoid saltwater and brackish water and to thoroughly wash any wound with soap after possible exposure. Brackish water is a mixture of fresh and salt water, often found where rivers meet the ocean.

Vibrio bacteria can infect people in multiple ways. In addition to entering the body through an open wound exposed to contaminated water, the bacteria can be contracted by eating raw or undercooked shellfish, particularly oysters. Officials are also advising people to fully cook seafood and keep cooked seafood away from raw seafood and its juices.

Signs of a Vibrio wound infection can include fever, pain, redness, swelling, discoloration or fluid discharge around the affected area, according to the CDC.

The bacteria are most prevalent between May and October, when coastal waters are warmer. But scientists have increasingly detected Vibrio in areas where water temperatures were once considered too cold for the pathogen to thrive.

Researchers in New York, for example, said in April that they had detected Vibrio vulnificus in several bodies of water off the coast of Long Island. Previous cases have also been reported around Long Island Sound, a development scientists have linked, in part, to warming waters driven by climate change.

Farther south, Maryland health officials have also urged swimmers to use caution in the Chesapeake Bay after more than two dozen cases were confirmed in the state this year.

Embed from Getty Images

Researchers with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency have estimated that the number of Vibrio infections in the United States could increase by 50 percent by 2090 compared with 1995 levels as sea temperatures continue to rise.

Dr. Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, told CBS News the bacteria are appearing progressively farther north as the climate warms.

“With every year now, because of climate change, we’re seeing it higher and higher in more northerly latitudes.”

Louisiana is not the only state reporting infections this year. Florida has recorded 14 Vibrio vulnificus cases, including two deaths, according to the Florida Department of Health. One person died in Marion County in Central Florida, while another death was reported in Palm Beach.

Florida officials have also warned that hurricanes and other major storms can increase the risk of exposure by pushing brackish coastal water farther inland.

The state experienced an especially deadly year for Vibrio vulnificus in 2024, when Hurricanes Helene and Milton struck the region. Florida reported 19 deaths from the bacterium that year.

The dangers of wound exposure were illustrated by the case of Summerlin Skipworth, who told CBS News she injured her foot on rocks while visiting Orange Beach, Alabama, over Labor Day weekend last year and contracted the infection. Within several days, the pain became severe enough that she went to an emergency room, where she tested positive for Vibrio vulnificus.

Embed from Getty Images

“It felt like somebody poured gasoline on my foot and lit it on fire.”

Skipworth underwent emergency surgery and was released shortly afterward. Doctors credited early detection with helping her recover. “An infection never crossed my mind,” she said. “I just knew I had pain in my foot.”

Vibrio vulnificus is among roughly a dozen Vibrio species capable of causing an illness known as vibriosis, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The CDC estimates that approximately 80,000 cases of vibriosis occur in the United States each year.

Vibrio vulnificus infections can be particularly dangerous. About one in five people infected with the bacterium die, according to the CDC, sometimes within just one or two days after becoming sick.

Symptoms can include diarrhea, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting and fever. In more severe cases, the infection can spread into the bloodstream, potentially causing low blood pressure and blistering skin lesions.

Hotez said people with underlying risk factors should be particularly careful about entering coastal waters with cuts or abrasions.

“If you have those risk factors, and if you have an open wound or abrasion in your skin, you do not want to go swimming in brackish waters along the Gulf Coast and the Atlantic Seaboard,” he said.

The growing geographic range of Vibrio has become a concern as ocean temperatures rise. Although the bacteria have long been associated with warmer coastal areas, infections and detections in places such as the Northeast suggest that the conditions favorable to Vibrio are expanding beyond their traditional range.

ebola

Ebola Outbreak Outpacing Recovery Efforts As Aid Workers Go On Strike Over Pay 

The world is currently experiencing one of the fastest-growing Ebola outbreaks in history. The virus is currently spreading at a rate faster than the efforts to fight it, according to the head of the World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. 

Ghebreyesus spoke with officials during a visit to the Congo, where some health workers are also currently on strike over a lack of pay, which is also slowing recovery efforts. 

This outbreak has been occurring for about three months with new courses doubling in some of the hot spots, Ghebreyesus stated in a post to his social media after meeting with officials in the capital Kinshasa. This marks the second visit that the WHO director-general took to the country since the outbreak was officially declared in mid-May. 

Embed from Getty Images

“We all agree that we must urgently and massively scale up all our efforts across all pillars of the response and by all partners.”

The outbreak itself has had over 3,800 confirmed cases and over 1,700 deaths as of the beginning of this week, according to the latest data from Congo’s Ministry of Health. 

In the epicenter of the outbreak, the Ituri province, it’s been reported that many of the front line workers have gone on strike. The healthcare workers have also been impacted by rebel conflict within one of Congo’s most remote and vulnerable areas. 

Some workers stated that they started receiving payment within the past week for the work they’ve been doing since the outbreak began, and are demanding improved wages, according to reports. 

A resident of Bunia, Anicet Baluku, told the Associated Press that he blamed the death of his two brothers from Ebola on the strike. “We urge the authorities to quickly find a solution to prevent other families from experiencing the same tragedy.”

The US Department of State said this week that it will be providing an additional $242 million in funding for immediate Ebola response and preparedness efforts in the region and for humanitarian assistance. 

Embed from Getty Images

The outbreak itself has outpaced all previous Ebola outbreaks due to its speed of transmission and is currently the second-largest outbreak on record after the 2014-2016 West Africa outbreak that had over 28,000 cases and more than 11,000 deaths. 

The specific Bundibugyo virus that is causing this current outbreak has no approved treatment or vaccine. 

Doctors Without Borders stated this week that the outbreak is still “spreading at an alarming and unprecedented rate. The response is expanding but is still not reaching communities quickly enough to break transmission chains.”

Dr. Jean Kaseya, the head of Africa Centers for Disease and Control, stated that during a visit to Bunia that contact tracing isn’t working, while 60% to 70% of new cases coming outside of those being monitored after exposure to patients. 

The later detection of cases has been a main contributor to the 45% fatality rate, according to officials. The health ministry stated that of the 77 most-recent cases reported during a 24-hour period, 44 were fatal, and at least 717 patients are in isolation with 749 patients have recovered. 

Dr. Kaseya also met with Ghebreyesus this week, and stated that the Africa CDC is “aligning its efforts with responders around earlier detection, stronger contact tracing, rapid access to quality care, and deeper engagement with communities.”

“Above all, communities must be at the center of and have ownership of the response. We cannot stop Ebola without their trust, leadership, and partnership,” he said.  

protein

Eating Less Protein May Support Healthy Aging, Review Finds

Despite the popularity of high-protein diets and protein-fortified foods, many adults may not know how much of the nutrient they actually need.

A major scientific review suggests that healthy adults who already consume adequate protein may gain little from eating more. Some evidence suggests that moderately reducing protein intake, or limiting certain amino acids that make up protein, could support metabolic health and biological processes associated with aging. In some organisms, lower protein intake has also been associated with a longer lifespan, even when total calorie consumption remained unchanged.

The review was led by pathologist and biomedical researcher Dudley Lamming, who studies aging at the University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health. It analyzed more than 350 studies involving people, mice, insects, yeast and other organisms. It was published in the journal Cell Press Blue.

Scientists have long studied calorie restriction as a possible way to extend lifespan and lower the risk of age-related illnesses, including cancer. But maintaining a reduced-calorie diet over long periods can be difficult, leading researchers to investigate whether limiting protein could produce some similar effects without requiring people to eat substantially less food.

“It’s absolutely crystal clear that there are benefits of protein to muscle growth and exercise response of active individuals. But because most people are relatively sedentary, many people are likely consuming more protein than they actually need, which probably has negative health consequences.”

The amount a person needs varies according to age, body size, activity level, pregnancy status and overall health. For a generally healthy adult, the recommended daily amount is about 0.36 grams per pound. A person weighing 140 pounds would need approximately 50 grams a day under that guideline.

The review comes amid a broader debate over protein guidance in the United States. Updated recommendations cited by the researchers call for some adults to consume between 1.2 and 1.6 grams per kilogram of body weight, or roughly 0.5 to 0.7 grams per pound, nearly twice the longstanding minimum recommendation.

Many American adults already exceed that amount.

An analysis of national health data found that adults who met exercise recommendations consumed about 82 grams of protein each day. Those who did not meet the exercise guidelines still averaged about 79 grams.

Embed from Getty Images

A single meal can provide a substantial portion of the daily recommendation. A 3- to 6-ounce serving of meat, chicken or fish often contains 20 to 30 grams of protein.

“It’s probably safe to say that for sedentary individuals, maybe [follow] the original [recommended daily amount of] 0.8 grams per kilogram,” said Lamming.

Manufacturers now add protein to coffee drinks, breakfast cereals, chips, ramen and other products that were not traditionally promoted as major protein sources. Packaging and advertising often suggest that a higher protein content makes a product healthier.

Consumer interest has grown alongside that marketing. A 2025 survey from the International Food Information Council found that 70% of U.S. adults said they “try” to eat protein. High-protein diets were the most popular diet pattern for the third year in a row.

At the same time, many survey respondents said they were unsure how much protein they should consume.

Physically active people may need more protein to support muscle repair, growth and recovery. Pregnant people and those recovering from surgery, injury or illness may also have higher requirements.

Protein can also be important during weight loss. People who are reducing calories may need adequate protein to help preserve muscle while losing body fat. Older adults may have different needs as well.

That does not mean inactive adults should immediately cut back on protein intake. The findings instead suggest that people who already consume enough may not need to keep seeking additional sources. For sedentary adults, increasing physical activity could have a greater effect on health than adding more protein to meals and snacks.

“These studies show that the amount of protein sedentary people are eating today may have negative health consequences, at least at the population level.”

The review also examined what may happen inside the body when protein intake is reduced. One potential effect involves FGF21, a hormone that helps regulate energy use and metabolism.

“There’s an increase in a hormone called FGF21 that promotes energy expenditure [when protein intake is reduced]. It essentially increases thermogenesis in your adipose tissue, so you don’t just store fat, but actually burn it as fuel.”

Embed from Getty Images

That mechanism may help explain why some studies have linked lower-protein diets to reduced body fat, improved blood sugar control and healthier metabolic function.

Recent human clinical trials reviewed by the researchers found that participants who reduced protein lost weight and body fat and improved their fasting blood sugar levels, even though some consumed more calories overall.

FGF21 has also been associated with lower inflammation. In mouse studies, animals with elevated levels of the hormone lived longer than typical mice, although the effect was greater in males than in females. Researchers have also observed that reducing protein raises FGF21 levels in people.

Lower protein intake may also alter signals that tell cells when to grow, repair damage or break down and reuse old cellular components. Those maintenance processes are believed to play a role in the aging process.

Some studies reviewed by Lamming also found potential benefits from reducing individual amino acids rather than lowering all dietary protein.

The evidence does not support protein deficiency, researchers said. Protein restriction in scientific studies is not the same as depriving the body of a nutrient it needs.

Aging is associated with sarcopenia, a gradual loss of muscle mass, strength and physical function. Eating enough protein and participating in strength or resistance exercise may help slow that decline.

The evidence on weight management and aging is not entirely one-sided. Other studies have found that higher-protein diets can support weight loss and help older adults maintain muscle, particularly when protein intake is paired with regular exercise.

People with kidney disease, liver disease and other medical conditions may also require individualized guidance. In some cases, they may be advised to limit their protein intake. In others, maintaining sufficient intake may be especially important.

Anyone considering a substantial change in protein consumption should consult a doctor or registered dietitian.

The review leaves several questions unresolved. The studies included in the analysis differed in their protein levels, dietary patterns, duration and design. Those differences make it difficult to determine exactly how much protein should be reduced or for how long a lower-protein diet should be followed.

Many of the studies were also conducted in animals, insects, yeast or other organisms. Findings from those experiments can help scientists identify biological mechanisms, but they do not always translate directly to people.

More long-term human research is needed to determine which adults could benefit from lower protein intake and whether reducing specific amino acids has the same effects as reducing total protein intake.

Researchers also continue to study whether the source of protein changes its health effects. Protein from beans, lentils, nuts and other plant foods may affect the body differently than protein from processed meats or fortified snack foods.

For now, the findings do not dispute that protein is necessary. They question whether healthy adults who already get enough need to add it to every meal, snack and beverage.