Posts

Bill Gates Says World Isn’t Prepared For The Impact Of AI, Calls For ‘Human-Reserved’ Jobs

Billionaire Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates recently published a 6,000-word essay in which he expressed major concern over artificial intelligence and how unprepared the world’s governments are regarding how much the technology will impact us in the future.

chatgpt

ChatGPT Advice Leads to Rare Bromide Poisoning in 60-Year-Old Man

A 60-year-old man’s quest to “improve his health” by reducing dietary chloride took a dangerous turn after he sought guidance from ChatGPT. Three months later, he was in a hospital emergency department with paranoia, hallucinations, and other troubling psychiatric symptoms. Doctors ultimately diagnosed him with bromism, a rare form of poisoning caused by prolonged exposure to bromide compounds.

The man’s case, published Aug. 5 in Annals of Internal Medicine Clinical Cases, began with his research into the health effects of table salt, also known as sodium chloride.

“After reading about the negative effects that sodium chloride, or table salt, has on one’s health, he was surprised that he could only find literature related to reducing sodium from one’s diet. Inspired by his history of studying nutrition in college, he decided to conduct a personal experiment to eliminate chloride from his diet. “

According to the report, the AI allegedly suggested replacing sodium chloride with sodium bromide — a chemical once used in sedatives, anticonvulsants, and sleep aids but largely abandoned decades ago due to toxicity concerns. While sodium bromide may appear chemically similar to table salt, it can be harmful when ingested over time. The man purchased the substance online and began using it in place of salt in his meals.

Bromide-containing drugs were common in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, but by the 1970s and 1980s, U.S. regulators removed most from over-the-counter shelves. The decision followed recognition that chronic exposure could cause bromism, a toxic buildup of bromide in the body. Symptoms can include agitation, psychosis, mania, delusions, memory problems, coordination issues, and skin reactions.

Embed from Getty Images

Bromide disrupts neuron function when levels in the body climb too high. In severe cases, it can mimic or mask other conditions — as happened with this patient. His initial lab tests suggested elevated chloride, but further analysis revealed a false reading known as pseudohyperchloremia, caused by bromide interfering with standard blood chemistry measurements.

When he arrived at the emergency department, the man reported that his neighbor was trying to poison him. Tests showed high blood alkalinity and carbon dioxide buildup. Over his hospital stay, paranoia intensified and hallucinations began. He attempted to leave the facility and was placed under an involuntary psychiatric hold, during which he was started on antipsychotic medication.

Once stabilized with fluids and electrolyte monitoring, he revealed his use of sodium bromide as a salt substitute, mentioning other symptoms that had emerged in recent weeks — insomnia, fatigue, clumsiness, severe thirst, acne, and small reddish skin bumps. These clues reinforced the bromism diagnosis.

Over three weeks, doctors tapered his antipsychotic medication, and he was discharged once stable. At a two-week follow-up, his condition remained improved.

While the exact conversation between the man and ChatGPT wasn’t available to the researchers, he said the AI suggested bromide as a substitute for chloride.

The authors tested a similar query on ChatGPT-3.5 and found that it did include bromide in its response, adding a vague “context matters” note but failing to warn against consumption or seek further clarification.

Embed from Getty Images

“While it is a tool with much potential to provide a bridge between scientists and the nonacademic population, AI also carries the risk for promulgating decontextualized information,” the report authors stated.

“It is highly unlikely that a medical expert would have mentioned sodium bromide when faced with a patient looking for a viable substitute for sodium chloride. Thus, as the use of AI tools increases, providers will need to consider this when screening for where their patients are consuming health information.”

When contacted for comment, OpenAI directed reporters to its terms of service, which explicitly state that outputs are not a substitute for professional medical advice and should not be relied upon as the sole source of factual information. A company spokesperson noted that OpenAI’s safety teams work to reduce such risks and encourage users to consult qualified professionals.

In a broader warning, a separate team of researchers recently tested six AI models, including ChatGPT, on their ability to interpret doctors’ clinical notes. They found that these systems were vulnerable to “adversarial hallucination attacks,” producing convincing but false clinical details. Technical safeguards reduced errors but didn’t eliminate them.

For the patient in this case, a seemingly simple experiment to cut chloride from his diet, aided by AI, nearly ended in disaster. While bromism is rare today, the ease of buying industrial chemicals online and the growing role of AI in everyday decision-making may mean such cases won’t remain isolated.

ai

President Biden Issues Executive Order for AI Oversight

On Monday, President Joe Biden signed an executive order covering a wide range of topics related to artificial intelligence, paving the way for new government regulations and funding.

The 111-page order covers multiple facets of AI and areas of concern or development, including civil rights, cybersecurity, discrimination, global competition, and a push for establishing federal AI jobs.

A senior White House official, who wished to remain anonymous, reportedly told NBC News that the potential uses of AI are so vast that effective regulations must cover a lot of ground. He also underscored the need for “significant bipartisan legislation.”

“AI policy is like running into a decathlon, and there’s 10 different events here, and we don’t have the luxury of just picking ‘we’re just going to do safety’ or ‘we’re just going to do equity’ or ‘we’re just going to do privacy.’ You have to do all of these things.”

Embed from Getty Images

The order expands on a July nonbinding agreement between seven of the most prominent U.S. technology companies developing AI. The agreement required the companies to hire outside experts to identify weaknesses in their systems. The government can legally require companies to disclose the results of those safety tests under the Defense Production Act.

The Department of Commerce will also be required to develop guidelines for properly “watermarking” AI content, such as “deepfake” videos and ChatGPT-generated essays.

In an interview with NBC News, the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence co-director Fei-Fei Li stressed the importance of government funding for AI to solve society’s pressing issues.

“The public sector holds a unique opportunity in terms of data and interdisciplinary talent to cure cancer, cure rare diseases, to map out biodiversity at a global scale, to understand and predict wildfires, to find climate solutions, to supercharge our teachers. There’s so much the public sector can do, but all of this is right now starved because we are severely lacking in resources.”

Embed from Getty Images

Some of the other topics covered in the order are geared toward anticipating and mitigating real-world problems that may arise from the widespread implementation of AI.

For instance, it asks the Department of Labor to address the potential for AI to cause job losses; the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Department of Housing and Urban Development to address how AI may exacerbate discrimination in banking and housing sectors; and the Office of Management and Budget, and others, to determine how the government can use AI without jeopardizing privacy rights.

The AI Now Institute managing director, Sarah Myers West, praised President Biden for including ethical concerns in the executive order. The nonprofit focuses on the societal implications of artificial intelligence use.

“It’s great to see the White House set the tone on the issues that matter most to the public: labor, civil rights, protecting privacy, promoting competition. This underscores you can’t deal with the future risks of AI without adequately dealing with the present. The key to looking forward will be to ensure strong enforcement as companies attempt to set a self-regulatory tone: industry cannot be left to lead the conversation on how to adequately address the effects of AI on the broader public.”

Amazon Alexa App and Dot

Regulating AI Technology

As we have propelled ourselves into the future, technology is developing at an outstanding rate. Many companies and countries have had to adjust laws and regulations in order to meet the demands of the ever-changing digital world. Anti-hacking laws and cyber security have seen many amendments and adjustments to cope with the un-probed areas of the digital landscape. Recently, calls for better regulations to control the developing area of Artificial Intelligence (AI) have been issued.

AI technology is an expansive area which in essence aims to mimic human intelligence with machine learning. The areas this technology can lend itself to varies from simple tasks to complex roles. We have already begun to see the uses of which in our everyday lives, many of us have Apple’s “Siri” in our pockets or Amazon’s “Alexa” in our homes. If not, the experiences of equivalent voice recognition technology in our phones, computers, TV’s, cars and more is not unknown.

The development of driver-less cars, virtual agents, management and learning systems all utilize AI technology. Its reach can be seen in that of agriculture, marketing, security, transport, manufacturing, climate change, healthcare and beyond. Its use and autonomy in all of these areas is rapidly developing and spreading into broad and specific niches.

Embed from Getty Images

It’s no wonder therefore, that there are calls for not only a more extensive look at AI regulation but a tailored approach. CEO of Alphabet, parent company of Google, recently called for such regulations. Where there are guidelines developing in both the US and EU he calls for a global standard. Writing in the Financial Times, he states that Google’s own AI regulations were outlined in 2018, the aims of which are to ensure principles such as “safety, privacy, fairness and accountability, alongside monitoring where AI should not be used, for example, where it could violate human rights.”

This call for regulation has not only been heard from Google, but other companies such as Twitter, who have recently confronted AI company Clearview, (a company used by homeland security and the FBI), to stop taking images from the site for facial recognition and thus violating Twitter’s privacy policies. Further, the European commission is considering a ban on facial recognition technology in order to catch up and address areas where the equipment could be abused and presumably prevent that. Where some countries such as China are embracing facial recognition and rolling it out rapidly, many campaigners have spoken out against the use of such technology as it infringes upon an individual’s privacy rights.

The use and development of AI technologies has exposed many challenges and considerations in ethics, safety, justice and beyond. Whilst technology companies and leaders develop Artificial Intelligence, they have the power to regulate and develop it into areas that they see fit. Therefore, without a government or a world code of conduct, how will these developers hold to a universal standard and fairly use these systems?

Embed from Getty Images

The answer to this seems already underway. In 2019, countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and beyond, totaling forty-two countries, formally agreed to uphold standards in AI technology development “to ensure AI systems are designed to be robust, safe, fair and trustworthy.” Countries such as the USA, UK and many in South America, Africa, Asia, Europe and the Middle East came together to agree on policies. The official OECD press release summarizes objectives such as:

1. AI should benefit people and the planet by driving inclusive growth, sustainable development and well-being.
2. AI systems should be designed in a way that respects the rule of law, human rights, democratic values and diversity, and they should include appropriate safeguards – for example, enabling human intervention where necessary – to ensure a fair and just society.
3. There should be transparency and responsible disclosure around AI systems to ensure that people understand when they are engaging with them and can challenge outcomes.
4. AI systems must function in a robust, secure and safe way throughout their lifetimes, and potential risks should be continually assessed and managed.
5. Organisations and individuals developing, deploying or operating AI systems should be held accountable for their proper functioning in line with the above principles.

Where innovation and technology are rapidly developing the question is how can we foresee all of the pitfalls and downsides that the advancement of such technology will bring? The call for regulation in itself may be something that needs constant revisiting and re-writing, alongside encouraging more and more governments to agree to universal standards. Without stalling progress and allowing all of the benefits of artificial technology to permeate and advance humanity, it seems a mammoth task to envisage and pre-meditate protection against all of the potential downsides and abuses.